Ferrario F, Tadros M, Napodano P, Giordano A, Sinico R A, Fellin G, D'Amico G
Division of Nephrology, San Carlo Hospital, Milano, Italy.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 1993;336:431-4. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-9182-2_76.
In order to clarify if "idiopathic" RPGN still exists as a distinct entity we reviewed 41 patients with histological picture of diffuse crescentic GN (60% of crescents) and no clinical evidence of systemic disease. According to the presence or absence of intraglomerular necrotizing lesions we subdivided the patients into two different morphological groups: Group I (25 pts) with necrotizing GN and massive periglomerular infiltrates; Group II (16 pts) with intra-extracapillary proliferation and no interstitial infiltrates. Our data suggest that "idiopathic" RPGN does not exist as a distinct entity, but is an expression either of renal limited vasculitis or crescentic GN complicating primary proliferative GN.
为了明确“特发性”急进性肾小球肾炎(RPGN)是否仍作为一种独特的实体存在,我们回顾了41例具有弥漫性新月体性肾小球肾炎组织学表现(新月体占60%)且无系统性疾病临床证据的患者。根据肾小球内坏死性病变的有无,我们将患者分为两个不同的形态学组:第一组(25例)为坏死性肾小球肾炎伴大量肾小球周围浸润;第二组(16例)为毛细血管内外增生且无间质浸润。我们的数据表明,“特发性”RPGN并非作为一种独特的实体存在,而是肾局限性血管炎或使原发性增殖性肾小球肾炎复杂化的新月体性肾小球肾炎的一种表现。