Suppr超能文献

植入式心脏复律除颤器电击的临床预测因素(CASCADE试验结果)。西雅图心脏骤停,传统治疗与胺碘酮药物评估。

Clinical predictors of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks (results of the CASCADE trial). Cardiac Arrest in Seattle, Conventional versus Amiodarone Drug Evaluation.

作者信息

Dolack G L

机构信息

Providence Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1994 Feb 1;73(4):237-41. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90226-7.

Abstract

The Cardiac Arrest in Seattle, Conventional Versus Amiodarone Drug Evaluation (CASCADE) study evaluated antiarrhythmic drug therapy in high-risk survivors of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy for 228 patients was randomized to amiodarone or conventional antiarrhythmic drugs. Additional therapy with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was provided to 105 of these patients. Clinical predictors of shocks were evaluated for the 88 patients with coronary artery disease (amiodarone 46, conventional 42), treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Survival free of all shocks at 2 years was 77% for patients taking amiodarone and 42% for those receiving conventional therapy (p = 0.014). Two-year survival free of syncopal shocks was 98% for amiodarone-treated patients and 81% for those receiving conventional agents (p = 0.01). Multiple clinical factors were evaluated by Cox analysis for potential clinical predictors of shocks. The independent clinical predictors of shocks were low ejection fraction (p = 0.002), female gender (p = 0.007) and conventional antiarrhythmic drug therapy (p = 0.015). The only independent predictor of a shock associated with syncope was conventional antiarrhythmic drug therapy (p = 0.035). Patients treated with amiodarone receive fewer shocks than patients treated with conventional drug therapy.

摘要

西雅图心脏骤停

胺碘酮与传统药物评估(CASCADE)研究评估了院外心室颤动高危幸存者的抗心律失常药物治疗。228例患者的抗心律失常药物治疗被随机分为胺碘酮组或传统抗心律失常药物组。其中105例患者接受了植入式心脏复律除颤器的额外治疗。对88例接受植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的冠心病患者(胺碘酮组46例,传统药物组42例)的电击临床预测因素进行了评估。服用胺碘酮的患者2年无电击生存率为77%,接受传统治疗的患者为42%(p = 0.014)。胺碘酮治疗的患者2年无晕厥性电击生存率为98%,接受传统药物治疗的患者为81%(p = 0.01)。通过Cox分析评估了多种临床因素作为电击的潜在临床预测因素。电击的独立临床预测因素为低射血分数(p = 0.002)、女性(p = 0.007)和传统抗心律失常药物治疗(p = 0.015)。与晕厥相关的电击的唯一独立预测因素是传统抗心律失常药物治疗(p = 0.035)。接受胺碘酮治疗的患者比接受传统药物治疗的患者电击次数更少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验