Bouchet C, Spyratos F, Martin P M, Hacène K, Gentile A, Oglobine J
Laboratoire d'immunochimie, Centre René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France.
Br J Cancer. 1994 Feb;69(2):398-405. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.74.
It is now clearly established that proteolytic enzymes, including plasminogen activator (uPA), play an important role in breaking down the extracellular matrix, which is considered to be a step in metastasis formation. Plasminogen activators are controlled at various levels. Two inhibitors, PAI-1 and PAI-2, have been identified, the latter being more specific for uPA. In attempts to determine their prognostic value, it is essential to investigate the relative importance of these parameters and their interactions. We used an immunoenzymatic method to assay uPA, PAI-1 and PAI-2 antigens in cytosols prepared from 314 primary breast tumours. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 years and all relevant clinical and laboratory findings were recorded. Univariate analysis confirmed the poor outcome of patients whose tumours contained large amounts of uPA and PAI-1. In addition, low levels of PAI-2 correlated with shorter disease-free survival in the overall population (P = 0.02), post-menopausal women (P = 0.02) and women without lymph node involvement (P = 0.02). Multivariate analysis in the 'main effects' Cox model identified node involvement, macroscopic tumour size and PAI-2 as significant variables. The 'interactive' model, taking into account interactions between uPA and its two inhibitors, identified a first subgroup with a very poor prognosis associating either high levels of PAI-1 with low levels of PAI-2 in the overall population and the women with no node involvement or high levels of uPA with low levels of PAI-2 in the group of menopausal women. We conclude that PAI-1 provides the same prognostic information as uPA, and does not appear to play a role as an inhibitor. In contrast, PAI-2 increases the prognostic value of uPA, particularly in post-menopausal women, and PAI-1 in patients with no node involvement.
现已明确证实,包括纤溶酶原激活剂(uPA)在内的蛋白水解酶在分解细胞外基质中发挥重要作用,而这被认为是转移形成过程中的一个步骤。纤溶酶原激活剂在多个水平受到调控。已鉴定出两种抑制剂,即PAI - 1和PAI - 2,后者对uPA更具特异性。为了确定它们的预后价值,研究这些参数的相对重要性及其相互作用至关重要。我们采用免疫酶法检测了314例原发性乳腺肿瘤细胞溶质中的uPA、PAI - 1和PAI - 2抗原。对患者进行了至少6年的随访,并记录了所有相关的临床和实验室检查结果。单因素分析证实,肿瘤中含有大量uPA和PAI - 1的患者预后较差。此外,PAI - 2水平低与总体人群(P = 0.02)、绝经后女性(P = 0.02)以及无淋巴结受累女性(P = 0.02)的无病生存期较短相关。“主效应”Cox模型中的多因素分析确定淋巴结受累、宏观肿瘤大小和PAI - 2为显著变量。“交互”模型考虑了uPA与其两种抑制剂之间的相互作用,确定了一个预后非常差的第一亚组,该亚组在总体人群和无淋巴结受累女性中,PAI - 1水平高且PAI - 2水平低,或者在绝经后女性组中uPA水平高且PAI - 2水平低。我们得出结论,PAI - 1提供与uPA相同的预后信息,并且似乎不作为抑制剂发挥作用。相比之下,PAI - 2增加了uPA的预后价值,特别是在绝经后女性中,而PAI - 1在无淋巴结受累的患者中具有此作用。