• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[从用户角度看长期治疗卡]

[The long-term treatment card from the user's viewpoint].

作者信息

Chueca Rodríguez C, Herrer Castejón A, Viejo Navarro L, Martínez Delgado F, Uriel Pérez J A

机构信息

Centro de Salud Almozara, Zaragoza.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 1993 Oct 31;12(7):397-400.

PMID:8297969
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To find the user's opinion of the long-term treatment card (LTC) as against repeat prescriptions from a medical clinic, the time employed on administration and information received on the use of the LTC. Criticisms and suggestions were gathered.

DESIGN

Crossover, by means of questionnaires filled in by the subjects.

SETTING

Almozara Health Centre, Zaragoza.

PATIENTS AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS

397 valid questionnaires given out to LTC users. The Primary Care team.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The LTC was preferred to a clinical prescription by 88% of those surveyed. 79% considered that they needed less time to obtain their prescriptions by using the LTC. 10% had difficulties in obtaining their treatment; 36% of them due to problems involving the collection/delivery timetable. 38% demanded the right to have medication included in the LTC: either at their own wish (18%), in the view of other INSALUD doctors (11%) or of any other medical officer (9%). 25% did not feel they were sufficiently informed.

CONCLUSIONS

The LTC is very widely accepted. Information on its use and functioning should be improved, with special emphasis on the inclusion of medication solely by the General Practitioner concerned. The criticisms collected, such as insufficient control of lengthy treatments or adverse side-effects, support the view that quality controls of the LTC are needed.

摘要

目的

了解用户对长期治疗卡(LTC)相对于从医疗诊所获取重复处方的看法、使用LTC的管理时间以及所获得的关于LTC使用的信息。收集批评意见和建议。

设计

采用受试者填写问卷的交叉设计。

地点

萨拉戈萨的阿尔莫萨拉健康中心。

患者及其他参与者

向LTC使用者发放了397份有效问卷。基层医疗团队。

测量及主要结果

88%的受访者更喜欢LTC而非临床处方。79%的人认为使用LTC获取处方所需时间更少。10%的人在获取治疗方面有困难;其中36%是由于取药/送药时间安排问题。38%的人要求有权将药物纳入LTC:出于自身意愿(18%)、其他国家卫生系统医生的意见(11%)或任何其他医务人员的意见(9%)。25%的人觉得没有得到充分的信息。

结论

LTC被广泛接受。应改进其使用和功能方面的信息,特别强调仅由相关全科医生纳入药物。所收集的批评意见,如对长期治疗或副作用控制不足,支持了需要对LTC进行质量控制的观点。

相似文献

1
[The long-term treatment card from the user's viewpoint].[从用户角度看长期治疗卡]
Aten Primaria. 1993 Oct 31;12(7):397-400.
2
[Management systems for the renewal of medical prescriptions: the vision of users and health professionals].[医疗处方续签管理系统:用户和卫生专业人员的视角]
Aten Primaria. 2007 Apr;39(4):195-200. doi: 10.1157/13100843.
3
Are healthcare aides underused in long-term care? A cross-sectional study on continuing care facilities in Canada.长期护理中医疗护理员是否未得到充分利用?一项关于加拿大持续护理机构的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 17;7(5):e015521. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015521.
4
[Compliance with long-term drug treatment: the prescription as a means of health education].[长期药物治疗的依从性:作为健康教育手段的处方]
Aten Primaria. 1993 Mar 15;11(4):182-4.
5
The role of disability in explaining long-term care utilization.残疾在解释长期护理使用情况方面的作用。
Med Care. 2009 Nov;47(11):1156-63. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181b69fa8.
6
Factors related to the decision-making for moving the older adults into long-term care facilities in Taiwan.与将老年人转移到台湾长期护理机构的决策相关的因素。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Sep;17(9):1319-1327. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12860. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
7
[Who prescribes? Origin and adequacy of long term prescriptions included in a computerized long term treatment programme at a health center].[谁来开处方?健康中心计算机化长期治疗计划中包含的长期处方的来源与适宜性]
Aten Primaria. 1993 Nov 15;12(8):465-8.
8
Predictors of the utilization of long-term care (LTC) services among residents in community-based LTC facilities in Taiwan.台湾社区长期护理机构居民长期护理服务利用的预测因素。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011 Nov-Dec;53(3):303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2010.11.009. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
9
[Undelayable visits in primary care. Description and identification of possible areas for improvement].[基层医疗中的不可延迟就诊。对可能的改进领域的描述与识别]
Rev Calid Asist. 2012 Jan-Feb;27(1):19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
10
The future of financing for long-term care: the Own Your Future campaign.长期护理融资的未来:“拥有你的未来”运动。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2010 Oct;22(4):379-93. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2010.507584.