Stheeman S E, Mileman P A, van't Hof M A, van der Stelt P F
Department of Oral Radiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1993 Aug;22(3):135-9. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.22.3.8299832.
The necessity for numerical probabilities in oral radiographic diagnosis is increasing, due to recent developments in computer-aided diagnosis, decision analysis, informed consent and medical litigation. These numerical probabilities are only partly available from current texts on oral radiology, where they are often expressed by ill-defined, semiquantitative phrases. Therefore, in this study 30 phrases expressing the probability of a relationship between a diagnosis and its symptoms were taken from a selected textbook on oral radiology. Seven oral radiologists from the USA and the Netherlands scored each of these probabilistic phrases on a 20-cm visual analogue scale. Low intraradiologist and high interradiologist variation was found. Because the high variation among authors of texts on oral radiology in interpreting probability information could have a negative influence on their ability to transfer unambiguous information to their readers, it is recommended that the use of semiquantitative phrases in oral radiology is restricted to five probability groups.