Rabchinsky J, Donly K J
Department of Oral Oncology, M.D. Anderson Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1993 Aug;13(4):378-83.
This study compared the caries inhibition and microleakage of two liners under amalgam restorations. Thirty-two molars received mesio-occlusal and disto-occlusal Class II cavity preparations. Calcium hydroxide was randomly placed as a liner in one preparation of each tooth and glass-ionomer cement liner was placed in the other. Amalgam restorations were placed. Teeth were axially loaded and an acid-protective varnish was placed. Teeth were placed into artificial saliva for 3 months, thermocycled, and cycled through a caries challenge. Sections were obtained from 20 teeth and photographed under polarized light. The remaining teeth were placed in 2% basic fuchsin and sectioned. A t-test indicated that restorations with glass-ionomer cement liners exhibited significantly less demineralization and microleakage than did restorations with calcium hydroxide liners.
本研究比较了两种垫底材料在银汞合金修复体下的防龋效果和微渗漏情况。32颗磨牙制备近中颌面和远中颌面Ⅱ类洞。每颗牙齿的一个洞随机用氢氧化钙作为垫底材料,另一个洞用玻璃离子水门汀垫底材料。进行银汞合金修复。对牙齿施加轴向负荷并涂覆防酸保护漆。将牙齿置于人工唾液中3个月,进行热循环,并通过龋损激发循环。从20颗牙齿获取切片并在偏光下拍照。其余牙齿置于2%碱性品红中并切片。t检验表明,与使用氢氧化钙垫底材料的修复体相比,使用玻璃离子水门汀垫底材料的修复体脱矿和微渗漏明显更少。