• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钽植入物作为评估正颌外科术后变化的标志物。

Tantalum implants as markers for evaluating postoperative orthognathic surgical changes.

作者信息

Rubenstein L K, Strauss R A, Lindauer S J, Davidovitch M, Isaacson R J

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, VCU/MCVC School of Dentistry, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0566.

出版信息

Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1993;8(3):203-9.

PMID:8301168
Abstract

The stability of sagittal split osteotomy advancements is not always 100% predictable. Assessment of postsurgical changes has historically relied on clinical evaluation of dental changes and superimposition of serial cephalograms, both of which have been shown to have serious drawbacks. A technique that improves the analysis of postsurgical changes is described in this paper; tantalum pin implants are placed in the osteotomized segments of patients undergoing surgical advancements. Implants eliminate many of the problems (orthodontic, growth, and remodeling changes) related to superimposition of presurgical and postsurgical cephalograms. Using this technique, surgical changes can be precisely analyzed, and the contribution of each factor of postsurgical relapse can be determined. This information, concerning the magnitude and direction of postsurgical changes, aids in following an individual's progress and increases the accuracy of large group studies by eliminating sources of variability in radiographic and clinical interpretation.

摘要

矢状劈开截骨术推进的稳定性并非总是100%可预测的。历史上,对术后变化的评估一直依赖于牙齿变化的临床评估和系列头颅侧位片的叠加,而这两者都存在严重缺陷。本文介绍了一种改进术后变化分析的技术;在接受手术推进的患者的截骨段中植入钽钉。植入物消除了许多与术前和术后头颅侧位片叠加相关的问题(正畸、生长和重塑变化)。使用该技术,可以精确分析手术变化,并确定术后复发各因素的作用。这些关于术后变化大小和方向的信息,有助于跟踪个体的进展,并通过消除影像学和临床解释中的变异性来源,提高大型群体研究的准确性。

相似文献

1
Tantalum implants as markers for evaluating postoperative orthognathic surgical changes.钽植入物作为评估正颌外科术后变化的标志物。
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1993;8(3):203-9.
2
A technique for accurate long-term follow-up of segment positional changes following sagittal split osteotomies.一种用于精确长期随访矢状劈开截骨术后节段位置变化的技术。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993 Jul;51(7):815-6. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(10)80432-x.
3
Seek and you shall find.寻则得之。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 Apr;52(4):431. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(94)90469-3.
4
The stability of bimaxillary osteotomy after correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion.
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1993;8(3):155-70.
5
Revisiting the supraforaminal horizontal oblique osteotomy of the mandible.重新审视下颌骨孔上水平斜行截骨术。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Feb;70(2):421-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.027.
6
Orthognathic surgery without the use of postoperative intermaxillary fixation. A clinical and cephalometric evaluation of surgical correction of mandibular and maxillary deformities.不使用术后颌间固定的正颌外科手术。下颌和上颌畸形手术矫正的临床及头影测量评估。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 1989;61:8-62.
7
Progressive changes in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion treated by 2-jaw surgery with minimal and conventional presurgical orthodontics: A comparative study.采用最小化和传统术前正畸治疗的双颌手术治疗骨性III类错牙合患者的进展性变化:一项对比研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Feb;149(2):244-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.018.
8
Stability of the mandible after sagittal ramus osteotomy for correction of prognathism.矢状支矢状劈开截骨术矫正下颌前突后下颌骨的稳定性。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Sep;44(9):693-7.
9
Radiography after orthognathic surgery. Part I. Normal appearance.正颌外科手术后的放射成像。第一部分。正常表现。
Radiology. 1988 Apr;167(1):191-4. doi: 10.1148/radiology.167.1.3347721.
10
Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.髁突矢状劈开截骨术后双侧可吸收皮质骨螺钉与钛钉固定下颌前突的骨稳定性比较研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;40(8):660-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Dec 29.