Radicioni A, Rossi T, Paris E, Mazzilli F, Dondero F, Giacomelli R, Tonietti G
Laboratory of Seminology and Immunology of Reproduction, University La Sapienza of Rome, Italy.
Acta Eur Fertil. 1993 Jan-Feb;24(1):31-9.
A study was carried out on five healthy, fertile donors to evaluate refrigeration at +4 C compared to cryopreservation at -196 degrees C. These donors had produced more than two pregnancies in different women with their cryopreserved semen in an AID program. The following parameters for evaluation and comparison were used: (i) the percentage of forward sperm motility, (ii) the percentage of swollen sperm after hypoosmotic stress (swelling test) and (iii) the sperm morphology observed both with a light microscope after staining and with an electron microscope. After 48 hours of refrigeration the result obtained were comparable with those observed after one week of cryopreservation. After 72 hours of refrigeration, a sharp and significant decrease of these values was noted. Our data underlined the fact that there is an individual variability in subject response to the method of preservation employed. Our findings show the possibility of using sperm refrigerated for up to 48 hours in AIH programs.
对五名健康、可育的供体进行了一项研究,以评估4℃冷藏与-196℃冷冻保存相比的效果。这些供体在一个人工授精(AID)项目中,其冷冻保存的精液使不同女性成功受孕超过两次。使用了以下评估和比较参数:(i)前向精子活力百分比;(ii)低渗应激后肿胀精子的百分比(肿胀试验);(iii)染色后用光学显微镜和电子显微镜观察的精子形态。冷藏48小时后得到的结果与冷冻保存一周后观察到的结果相当。冷藏72小时后,这些值出现了急剧且显著的下降。我们的数据强调了一个事实,即个体对所采用的保存方法的反应存在差异。我们的研究结果表明,在人工授精(AIH)项目中使用冷藏长达48小时的精子是有可能的。