• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

芬兰两个城市可摘义齿损坏情况的评估。

Evaluation of damage to removable dentures in two cities in Finland.

作者信息

Vallittu P K, Lassila V P, Lappalainen R

机构信息

Department of Prosthetics and Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Scand. 1993 Dec;51(6):363-9. doi: 10.3109/00016359309040587.

DOI:10.3109/00016359309040587
PMID:8304013
Abstract

The number of damaged dentures and type of damage to removable dentures repaired in dental laboratories was investigated using a questionnaire sent to 24 dental laboratories in Finland. Eight variables were examined for each damaged denture. The results showed that the type of dentures most commonly needing repair was the complete upper denture (49%). The most frequent type of damage was breakdown of the acrylic base and loosening of an artificial tooth. The chi-square test established a statistical dependence (p < 0.005) between damaged dentures and their age. Damaged upper partial dentures most frequently had natural teeth or fixed prostheses as antagonist teeth. Damaged lower skeletal dentures and acrylic partial dentures had a complete denture as the antagonist (p < 0.05). Removable dentures made of acrylic resin material seemed to break despite strengtheners, such as clasp wire.

摘要

通过向芬兰的24家牙科实验室发送问卷,调查了牙科实验室修复的可摘义齿的损坏数量和损坏类型。对每副损坏的义齿检查了八个变量。结果表明,最常需要修复的义齿类型是上颌全口义齿(49%)。最常见的损坏类型是丙烯酸基托断裂和人造牙松动。卡方检验确定了损坏义齿与其使用年限之间存在统计学相关性(p < 0.005)。损坏的上颌局部义齿最常以天然牙或固定修复体作为对抗牙。损坏的下颌支架式义齿和丙烯酸局部义齿以上颌全口义齿作为对抗牙(p < 0.05)。尽管使用了诸如卡环丝等增强材料,但由丙烯酸树脂材料制成的可摘义齿似乎仍会断裂。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of damage to removable dentures in two cities in Finland.芬兰两个城市可摘义齿损坏情况的评估。
Acta Odontol Scand. 1993 Dec;51(6):363-9. doi: 10.3109/00016359309040587.
2
Wear of resin denture teeth in partial removable dental prostheses.部分可摘义齿中树脂牙的磨损。
J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Jan;64(1):85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 May 10.
3
Glass fiber reinforcement in repaired acrylic resin removable dentures: preliminary results of a clinical study.修复后的丙烯酸树脂可摘义齿中的玻璃纤维增强:一项临床研究的初步结果。
Quintessence Int. 1997 Jan;28(1):39-44.
4
Denture fracture--a survey.义齿折断——一项调查
Br Dent J. 1994 May 7;176(9):342-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808449.
5
Repair of a removable partial denture using gold occlusals.
J Prosthodont. 1995 Dec;4(4):269-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1995.tb00355.x.
6
Age and maintenance of removable dentures in Finland.芬兰可摘义齿的使用年限及维护情况
J Oral Rehabil. 1992 Mar;19(2):123-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01089.x.
7
Clinical survey of acrylic resin removable denture repairs with glass-fiber reinforcement.玻璃纤维增强丙烯酸树脂可摘义齿修复的临床研究
Int J Prosthodont. 2001 May-Jun;14(3):219-24.
8
Frequency and suppliers of removable dentures in Finland in 1983.1983年芬兰可摘义齿的使用频率及供应商情况
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1985 Feb;13(1):47-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1985.tb00420.x.
9
Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.在关键位置采用种植体支持的可摘义齿,随访长达8年。
Int J Prosthodont. 2009 May-Jun;22(3):233-41; discussion 242.
10
Stress distribution of abutments and base displacement with precision attachment- and telescopic crown-retained removable partial dentures.精密附着体和套筒冠固位可摘局部义齿基牙的应力分布及基托位移
J Oral Rehabil. 2003 May;30(5):482-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01092.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Experimental Testing and Numerical Bite Simulation of Complete Acrylic Dentures in Eugnathic and Progenic Occlusal Relationships.正常咬合与前伸咬合关系下全口丙烯酸义齿的实验测试与数值咬合模拟
Materials (Basel). 2025 May 22;18(11):2427. doi: 10.3390/ma18112427.
2
Evaluation of the Bond Strength between the Acrylic Teeth and Reinforced or Non-reinforced Complete Denture Base.丙烯酸牙与增强或非增强全口义齿基托之间粘结强度的评估。
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2024 Sep;58(3):218-232. doi: 10.15644/asc58/3/3.
3
Effect of Different Surface Treatments as Methods of Improving the Mechanical Properties after Repairs of PMMA for Dentures.
不同表面处理方法对义齿聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯修复后力学性能改善的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jul 2;17(13):3254. doi: 10.3390/ma17133254.
4
Antifungal activity, mechanical properties, and accuracy of three-dimensionally printed denture base with microencapsulated phytochemicals on varying post-polymerization time.三种不同后聚合时间下微囊化植物化学物质增材制造义齿基托的抗真菌活性、机械性能和准确性。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 15;22(1):611. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02654-9.
5
Mechanical Properties Evaluation of Three Different Materials for Implant Supported Overdenture: An In-Vitro Study.三种不同种植体支持覆盖义齿材料的力学性能评估:一项体外研究。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Oct 2;15(19):6858. doi: 10.3390/ma15196858.
6
Comparison of Bond Strength of Acrylic, Composite, and Nanocomposite Artificial Teeth to Heat-Cure Acrylic Denture Base Resin.丙烯酸类、复合树脂类和纳米复合树脂类人工牙与热固化型丙烯酸类义齿基托树脂粘结强度的比较。
Front Dent. 2019 May-Jun;16(3):166-172. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i3.1587. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
7
Complete denture fracture - A proposed classification system and its incidence in National Capital Region population: A survey.全口义齿折断——一种提议的分类系统及其在国家首都地区人群中的发生率:一项调查
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019 Oct-Dec;19(4):307-312. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_312_18. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
8
An overview of development and status of fiber-reinforced composites as dental and medical biomaterials.纤维增强复合材料作为牙科和医学生物材料的发展与现状综述。
Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2018 Apr 12;4(1):44-55. doi: 10.1080/23337931.2018.1457445. eCollection 2018.
9
Comparative failure load values of acrylic resin denture teeth bonded to three different heat cure denture base resins: An in vitro study.三种不同热固化义齿基托树脂粘结的丙烯酸树脂义齿牙的比较性破坏载荷值:一项体外研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Apr;6(Suppl 1):S12-6. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.181161.
10
Outcome of single maxillary complete dentures opposing mandibular teeth: A need to introspect on the prosthodontic treatment protocol.单上颌全口义齿与下颌牙齿相对的修复效果:对修复治疗方案进行反思的必要性。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):15-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.167941.