Hoff S J, Reilly M K, Merrill W H, Stewart J, Frist W H, Morris J A
Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Am Surg. 1994 Feb;60(2):151-4.
Injury to the innominate or subclavian artery is an uncommon but difficult management problem. Review of trauma admissions from August 1983 to August 1992 revealed 21 patients who sustained injury to the innominate or subclavian artery. Eight patients sustained blunt trauma, while 13 patients sustained penetrating injuries. The mechanism of injury was variable, and associated injuries were common in both blunt and penetrating trauma. Injuries involved the right innominate or subclavian artery in 10 patients and the left subclavian artery in 11 patients. Twenty patients were managed operatively. Primary repair was preferred for penetrating injuries, whereas a bypass graft was more common for blunt injuries (P = 0.41). Patients with penetrating injury were more unstable at presentation (admission systolic blood pressure 73 mm Hg vs 119 mm Hg, P = 0.006; preoperative evaluation time 66 min vs 319 min, P = 0.002) and required more blood transfusions (5 units vs 26 units, P = 0.007) than patients with blunt injuries. Mortality for the entire series was 24 per cent (0% blunt vs 38% penetrating, P = 0.047). Hospital days (28 vs 48) and ICU days (8 vs 14) were longer for survivors of penetrating injuries (P = NS). Complications were common in both groups. Innominate/subclavian artery injury remains a significant cause of mortality and morbidity.
无名动脉或锁骨下动脉损伤虽不常见,但处理起来颇具难度。回顾1983年8月至1992年8月期间的创伤入院病例,发现有21例患者发生了无名动脉或锁骨下动脉损伤。8例患者为钝性创伤,13例患者为穿透性损伤。损伤机制各不相同,钝性和穿透性创伤中均常见合并伤。10例患者的损伤累及右无名动脉或右锁骨下动脉,11例患者的损伤累及左锁骨下动脉。20例患者接受了手术治疗。穿透性损伤首选一期修复,而钝性损伤则更常采用旁路移植术(P = 0.41)。穿透性损伤患者就诊时情况更不稳定(入院收缩压73 mmHg对119 mmHg,P = 0.006;术前评估时间66分钟对319分钟,P = 0.002),且比钝性损伤患者需要更多输血(5单位对26单位,P = 0.007)。整个系列的死亡率为24%(钝性损伤为0%,穿透性损伤为38%,P = 0.047)。穿透性损伤幸存者的住院天数(28天对48天)和重症监护病房天数(8天对14天)更长(P = 无显著差异)。两组并发症均很常见。无名动脉/锁骨下动脉损伤仍是导致死亡和发病的重要原因。