What is misconduct in science?

Suppr

超能文献

作者信息

Schachman H K

机构信息

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley 94720.

出版信息

Science. 1993 Jul 9;261(5118):148-9, 183. doi: 10.1126/science.8305005.

DOI:10.1126/science.8305005

PMID:8305005

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

What is misconduct in science?

Science. 1993 Jul 9;261(5118):148-9, 183. doi: 10.1126/science.8305005.

The definition of misconduct in science: a view from NSF.

Science. 1993 Jan 29;259(5095):584-5, 647-8. doi: 10.1126/science.8430300.

Federal actions against plagiarism in research.

J Infor Ethics. 1996 Spring;5(1):34-51.

From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.

Account Res. 2003 Apr-Jun;10(2):123-35. doi: 10.1080/08989620300508.

Reassignment for NIH's fraud hunters.

Lancet. 1993 May 8;341(8854):1204-5. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91017-g.

Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.

J Higher Educ. 1994 May-Jun;65(3):286-97.

Resounding echoes of Gallo case.

Lancet. 1995 Mar 11;345(8950):639. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90530-8.

Of mice and men. Honesty and integrity in medicine.

Ann Surg. 1994 Dec;220(6):745-50. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199412000-00007.

Federal health officials continue to reorganize offices for investigating scientific misconduct.

JAMA. 1992 Aug 19;268(7):848.

Should the government assure scientific integrity?

Acad Med. 1993 Sep;68(9 Suppl):S56-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199309000-00035.

引用本文的文献

Is it time to revise the definition of research misconduct?

Account Res. 2019 Feb;26(2):123-137. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1570156. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

The case of Vipul Bhrigu and the federal definition of research misconduct.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Jun;20(2):411-21. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9459-y. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Jan;12(1):53-74. doi: 10.1007/pl00022268.

Developing a federal policy on research misconduct.

Sci Eng Ethics. 1999 Apr;5(2):261-72. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0017-6.

Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research.

Sci Eng Ethics. 1999 Apr;5(2):205-14. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0011-z.

Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: what has and has not been accomplished?

Sci Eng Ethics. 1999 Apr;5(2):161-76. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0005-x.

Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Jan;6(1):109-21. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0029-8.

Fraud, misconduct or normal science in medical research--an empirical study of demarcation.

J Med Ethics. 1999 Dec;25(6):501-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.6.501.

Preventing scientific misconduct.

Am J Public Health. 1998 Jan;88(1):125-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.1.125.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

What is misconduct in science?

Science. 1993 Jul 9;261(5118):148-9, 183. doi: 10.1126/science.8305005.

The definition of misconduct in science: a view from NSF.

Science. 1993 Jan 29;259(5095):584-5, 647-8. doi: 10.1126/science.8430300.

Federal actions against plagiarism in research.

J Infor Ethics. 1996 Spring;5(1):34-51.

From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.

Account Res. 2003 Apr-Jun;10(2):123-35. doi: 10.1080/08989620300508.

Reassignment for NIH's fraud hunters.

Lancet. 1993 May 8;341(8854):1204-5. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91017-g.

Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.

J Higher Educ. 1994 May-Jun;65(3):286-97.

Resounding echoes of Gallo case.

Lancet. 1995 Mar 11;345(8950):639. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90530-8.

Of mice and men. Honesty and integrity in medicine.

Ann Surg. 1994 Dec;220(6):745-50. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199412000-00007.

Federal health officials continue to reorganize offices for investigating scientific misconduct.

JAMA. 1992 Aug 19;268(7):848.

Should the government assure scientific integrity?

Acad Med. 1993 Sep;68(9 Suppl):S56-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199309000-00035.

引用本文的文献

Is it time to revise the definition of research misconduct?

Account Res. 2019 Feb;26(2):123-137. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1570156. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

The case of Vipul Bhrigu and the federal definition of research misconduct.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Jun;20(2):411-21. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9459-y. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Jan;12(1):53-74. doi: 10.1007/pl00022268.

Developing a federal policy on research misconduct.

Sci Eng Ethics. 1999 Apr;5(2):261-72. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0017-6.

Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research.

Sci Eng Ethics. 1999 Apr;5(2):205-14. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0011-z.

Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: what has and has not been accomplished?

Sci Eng Ethics. 1999 Apr;5(2):161-76. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0005-x.

Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Jan;6(1):109-21. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0029-8.

Fraud, misconduct or normal science in medical research--an empirical study of demarcation.

J Med Ethics. 1999 Dec;25(6):501-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.6.501.

Preventing scientific misconduct.

Am J Public Health. 1998 Jan;88(1):125-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.1.125.