Jarrell J F, Labelle R, Goeree R, Milner R, Collins J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Online J Curr Clin Trials. 1993 Jul 2;Doc No 73:[3483 words; 37 paragraphs].
The clinical indications for in vitro fertilization (IVF) have expanded to include many forms of infertility in addition to tubal disease. Pregnancies in IVF cycles are noteworthy but there is frequently a spontaneous cure for infertility among similar couples. The relative merit of IVF treatment over spontaneous cure or other forms of fertility treatment has not been rigorously evaluated.
The study was a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the clinical pregnancy rate among couples undergoing IVF with the rate among couples awaiting an IVF treatment.
Patients entering a provincially funded program of IVF were randomly allocated to a period of delay prior to IVF treatment (Control n = 194) or 1 or more cycles of IVF treatment (Experimental n = 205).
Clinical pregnancy rate and adjusted time to pregnancy.
In the Control group there were 13 pregnancies. In the Experimental group there were 13 pregnancies before treatment could be arranged. There were 20 additional pregnancies in treatment cycles. The intention-to-treat analysis showed an increase in the proportion of pregnancies from 8% to 17.4% and parturition from 4.9% to 11.6%. Substantially more patient-time (due to IVF) was required to achieve this increase. There was no difference between groups when time-to-event was considered by survival analysis, although a long-term trend in favor of the Experimental group was suggested. Low-event frequency and broad confidence intervals in Control patients prior to censor and transfer to IVF treatment prevented a conclusive assessment of the long-term benefits of IVF treatment. Generalizing these findings, improved effectiveness may be evident with delayed access to treatment (longer waiting lists), suitable candidates with appropriate primary clinical diagnoses and durations of infertility and higher rates of treatment over time (larger clinics).
IVF treatment is effective in increasing, proportionally, the numbers of pregnancies, live births, and parturitions, but this occurred with significantly longer patient commitment.
体外受精(IVF)的临床适应症已扩大,除输卵管疾病外,还包括多种形式的不孕症。IVF周期中的妊娠值得关注,但类似夫妇中不孕症常常会自然治愈。IVF治疗相对于自然治愈或其他形式的生育治疗的相对优势尚未得到严格评估。
该研究是一项随机对照临床试验,比较接受IVF治疗的夫妇与等待IVF治疗的夫妇的临床妊娠率。
进入省级资助IVF项目的患者被随机分配到IVF治疗前的延迟期(对照组n = 194)或1个或更多周期的IVF治疗(试验组n = 205)。
临床妊娠率和调整后的妊娠时间。
对照组有13例妊娠。试验组在能够安排治疗前有13例妊娠。治疗周期中有另外20例妊娠。意向性分析显示妊娠比例从8%增加到17.4%,分娩比例从4.9%增加到11.6%。实现这一增长需要更多的患者时间(由于IVF)。当通过生存分析考虑事件发生时间时,两组之间没有差异,尽管提示试验组有长期趋势。对照组患者在审查和转至IVF治疗前事件发生率低且置信区间宽,妨碍了对IVF治疗长期益处的确定性评估。推广这些发现,随着延迟获得治疗(更长的等候名单)、具有适当主要临床诊断和不孕症持续时间的合适候选者以及随着时间推移更高的治疗率(更大的诊所),有效性可能会更明显。
IVF治疗在按比例增加妊娠、活产和分娩数量方面是有效的,但这伴随着患者显著更长的投入时间。