Sherman M S
Department of Medicine, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia.
Chest. 1994 Feb;105(2):544-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.2.544.
To evaluate an equation that estimates resting energy expenditure from two easily obtained measurements--expired carbon dioxide and minute ventilation, and compare the results of this equation with standard methods of estimating and measuring caloric expenditure in mechanically ventilated patients.
Prospective evaluation in a consecutive, unselected cohort.
Medical, surgical, and coronary intensive care units in a university hospital.
Twenty-five patients (16 to 79 years of age) receiving mechanical ventilation.
Indirect calorimetry (IC), minute ventilation (VE), and partial pressure of expired carbon dioxide (PECO2) were obtained on all patients. Harris-Benedict equations were calculated and corrected for known stress factors (HBc). Calculated energy expenditure (CEE) was determined using the following equation: CEE = 9.27 x VE x PECO2 CEE was then compared with IC and HBc.
The IC was interpretable in 22 of 25 patients, and CEE was significantly better at estimating caloric requirements than HBc. The mean absolute difference between CEE and IC was significantly less than between HBc and IC (118 +/- 96 vs 302 +/- 269, p < .003). CEE estimated caloric requirements to within 200 kcal of IC in 16 of 22 (72 percent); HBc estimated within 200 kcal of IC in 9 of 22 (41 percent).
Minute ventilation and expired carbon dioxide measurements are easily and inexpensively obtainable. Energy expenditures calculated from these measurements (CEE) compare favorably with values obtained from a metabolic cart and are significantly more accurate than HBc.
评估一种通过两项易于获取的测量指标(呼出二氧化碳和分钟通气量)来估算静息能量消耗的公式,并将该公式的结果与估算和测量机械通气患者热量消耗的标准方法进行比较。
对一个连续、未经过筛选的队列进行前瞻性评估。
一所大学医院的内科、外科和冠心病重症监护病房。
25例接受机械通气的患者(年龄16至79岁)。
对所有患者进行间接测热法(IC)、分钟通气量(VE)和呼出二氧化碳分压(PECO2)的测量。计算哈里斯-本尼迪克特公式并针对已知应激因素进行校正(HBc)。使用以下公式确定计算能量消耗(CEE):CEE = 9.27×VE×PECO2。然后将CEE与IC和HBc进行比较。
25例患者中有22例的IC可解读,CEE在估算热量需求方面明显优于HBc。CEE与IC之间的平均绝对差值显著小于HBc与IC之间的差值(118±96 vs 302±269,p <.003)。22例中有16例(72%)的CEE估算的热量需求与IC相差在200千卡以内;22例中有9例(41%)的HBc估算的热量需求与IC相差在200千卡以内。
分钟通气量和呼出二氧化碳的测量容易且成本低廉。通过这些测量得出的能量消耗(CEE)与代谢车测得的值相比具有优势,且比HBc显著更准确。