Suppr超能文献

囊性纤维化杂合子的大规模筛查:两种检测系统的比较

Mass screening for cystic fibrosis heterozygotes: two assay systems compared.

作者信息

Gilfillan A, Axton R, Brock D J

机构信息

Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1994 Feb;40(2):197-9.

PMID:8313593
Abstract

Two different assay systems were used to detect mutant cystic fibrosis alleles in mouthwash samples from pregnant women attending antenatal clinics. In the first phase of the study, comprising 3110 consecutive samples, we compared the performance of an in-house system and a commercial amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS). Successful analyses were completed at first attempt in approximately 90% of samples, and the patient resampling rate was 1.1%. There were no false positives and only one detected false negative. In the second phase, comprising 3333 consecutive samples, only ARMS was used. Again, there were no false positives and the patient resampling rate dropped to 0.5%. On the basis of convenience and reduced operator time, we have elected to use ARMS for further screening for cystic fibrosis heterozygotes.

摘要

使用两种不同的检测系统来检测产前诊所中孕妇漱口水样本中的囊性纤维化突变等位基因。在该研究的第一阶段,包括3110个连续样本,我们比较了内部系统和商业扩增不应性突变系统(ARMS)的性能。大约90%的样本首次尝试就完成了成功分析,患者重新采样率为1.1%。没有假阳性,仅检测到一例假阴性。在第二阶段,包括3333个连续样本,仅使用了ARMS。同样,没有假阳性,患者重新采样率降至0.5%。基于便利性和减少操作人员时间,我们选择使用ARMS进一步筛查囊性纤维化杂合子。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验