Cembrowski G S, Engebretson M J, Hackney J R, Carey R N
Park Nicollet Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Clin Lab Med. 1993 Dec;13(4):973-85.
Although CLIA 88 has probably caused the laboratorian to place inordinate emphasis on proficiency testing, we believe that it will ultimately improve clinical laboratory practice. Due to the increased numbers of challenges within a mailing, the laboratorian has a greater ability to gauge magnitudes and types of any existing error. These magnitudes can be compared with previously established limits to determine the need for corrective action. Laboratories are encouraged to devise a system to guarantee accurate preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic PT processing and reporting. Due to the relatively low imprecisions of today's hematology analyzers compared with the HCFA limits, most hematology laboratories should focus their attention on measures of and factors affecting long-term control and calibration. More attention should be paid to moving averages of indices and the analytic performance in regional or manufacturer control pools.
虽然CLIA 88可能使实验室工作人员过度强调能力验证,但我们相信它最终将改善临床实验室实践。由于一次邮寄中挑战数量的增加,实验室工作人员有更强的能力来衡量任何现有误差的大小和类型。这些大小可以与先前设定的限值进行比较,以确定是否需要采取纠正措施。鼓励实验室设计一个系统,以确保分析前、分析中和分析后能力验证过程的准确处理和报告。由于与HCFA限值相比,当今血液学分析仪的不精密度相对较低,大多数血液学实验室应将注意力集中在长期控制和校准的测量方法及影响因素上。应更多关注指标的移动平均值以及区域或厂家控制样本中的分析性能。