• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共付额和通用名药物替代对处方药使用及成本的影响。

The effects of copayments and generic substitution on the use and costs of prescription drugs.

作者信息

Smith D G

机构信息

Department of Health Services Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2029.

出版信息

Inquiry. 1993 Summer;30(2):189-98.

PMID:8314607
Abstract

Rising costs of prescription drugs are a concern to both private and public purchasers. Common methods of controlling or sharing costs include copayments and incentives to use generic substitutes. A study of prescription drug use and costs for a set of employer groups reveals that a common change in the rate of copayment from $3 to $5 per prescription is estimated to be associated with a 5% decrease in the number of prescriptions, an offsetting increase in ingredient costs per prescription, a 10% decrease in employer costs per person, and an increase in employee costs of approximately the $2 copayment per prescription.

摘要

处方药成本的不断上升是私人和公共购买者都关心的问题。控制或分担成本的常见方法包括自付费用以及鼓励使用通用替代品。一项针对一组雇主群体的处方药使用和成本的研究表明,每张处方的自付费用率从3美元普遍提高到5美元,估计会使处方数量减少5%,每张处方的成分成本相应增加,雇主人均成本降低10%,而员工成本则因每张处方增加约2美元的自付费用而上升。

相似文献

1
The effects of copayments and generic substitution on the use and costs of prescription drugs.共付额和通用名药物替代对处方药使用及成本的影响。
Inquiry. 1993 Summer;30(2):189-98.
2
Assessing the effect of Taiwan's outpatient prescription drug copayment policy in the elderly.评估台湾门诊处方药共付政策对老年人的影响。
Med Care. 2003 Dec;41(12):1331-42. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000100579.91550.C4.
3
Impact of cost sharing on prescription drugs used by Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的处方药费用分担的影响。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Jun;6(2):100-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 May 7.
4
A comparison of mail-service and retail community pharmacy claims in 5 prescription benefit plans.5种处方福利计划中邮购服务药房与零售社区药房索赔情况的比较。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2009 Jun;5(2):133-42. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2008.06.002. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
5
The association of insurance type with costs of dispensed drugs.保险类型与配药费用的关联。
Inquiry. 1998 Spring;35(1):23-35.
6
Employers push to manage prescription drug costs.雇主们努力控制处方药成本。
Bus Health. 1992 May;10(6):43-6, 48, 50.
7
Managing prescription drug costs.管理处方药成本。
Empl Benefits J. 2001 Mar;26(1):35-40.
8
The effect of incentive-based formularies on prescription-drug utilization and spending.基于激励措施的药品处方集对处方药使用及支出的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2224-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa030954.
9
Rising drug costs: the impact on dermatology.不断上涨的药品成本:对皮肤科的影响。
Skin Therapy Lett. 2000;5(4):1-2,5.
10
Do drug copayments work?药物自付费用有效吗?
CMAJ. 1994 May 1;150(9):1491-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Inflation and Its Uncertainty on Pharmaceutical Prices: Evidence from Iran.通货膨胀及其不确定性对药品价格的影响:来自伊朗的证据。
Iran J Pharm Res. 2021 Summer;20(3):94-101. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2020.114071.14646.
2
Impact of differential copayment on patient healthcare choice: evidence from South Korean National Cohort Study.不同共付额对患者医疗保健选择的影响:来自韩国全国队列研究的证据。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 23;11(6):e044549. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044549.
3
Prescribing Behavior of General Practitioners for Generic Drugs.
基层医生对仿制药的处方行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 14;17(16):5919. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165919.
4
Effects of a 3-Tier Pharmacy Benefit Design on the Prescription Purchasing Behavior of Individuals With Chronic Disease.三层次药品福利设计对慢性病患者处方购买行为的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 May;26(5):575-585. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.5.575.
5
Determinants of pharmaceutical expenditures of urban households: A time series study in Kermanshah province (Iran).城市家庭药品支出的决定因素:克尔曼沙阿省(伊朗)的一项时间序列研究。
Electron Physician. 2015 Nov 20;7(7):1470-5. doi: 10.19082/1470. eCollection 2015 Nov.
6
Access to oral osteoporosis drugs among female Medicare Part D beneficiaries.女性医疗保险D部分受益人获得口服骨质疏松症药物的情况。
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Jul-Aug;24(4):e435-45. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 May 14.
7
The impact of regional co-payment and national reimbursement criteria on statins use in Italy: an interrupted time-series analysis.区域共付额和国家报销标准对意大利他汀类药物使用的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 6;14:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-6.
8
Association of Medicare Part D medication out-of-pocket costs with utilization of statin medications.医疗保险 D 部分药物自付费用与他汀类药物使用的关联。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug;48(4):1311-33. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12022. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
9
What impact do prescription drug charges have on efficiency and equity? Evidence from high-income countries.处方药费用对效率和公平有何影响?来自高收入国家的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2008 May 2;7:12. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-7-12.
10
Prescription drug cost sharing: associations with medication and medical utilization and spending and health.处方药费用分担:与药物使用、医疗利用、支出及健康的关联
JAMA. 2007 Jul 4;298(1):61-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.1.61.