Hayes B K, Taplin J E
Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle, N.S.W., Australia.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1993 Jun;55(3):329-52. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1993.1019.
This study is an attempt to clarify the nature of developmental differences in the use of prototypical features or information about specific exemplars for object categorization and to identify stimulus factors that may modulate the use of these information sources. To this end, 6-year-olds, 11-year-olds, and adults were taught to sort visual patterns into one of two overlapping categories. Immediately or 24 h following category acquisition subjects were presented with a set of transfer stimuli consisting of both old and new patterns, including the theoretical prototype. Categorization responses to these test stimuli were examined against predictions derived from the prototype and nearest-old-exemplar accounts of categorization. A significant developmental change in the process of categorization was noted. For the youngest group, only the prototype model was found to fit the test data, whereas for the older groups both models independently explained significant amounts of variance in performance. This trend was not affected by the delay between training and testing, nor by a manipulation of intracategory variability. The emergence of the specific exemplar model as a viable explanation of ill-defined categorization thus appears to be related to the developmental level attained.
本研究旨在阐明在物体分类中使用原型特征或特定示例信息时发育差异的本质,并识别可能调节这些信息源使用的刺激因素。为此,研究人员让6岁、11岁儿童及成年人学习将视觉图案分类为两个重叠类别之一。在类别习得后立即或24小时后,向受试者呈现一组由新旧图案组成的迁移刺激,包括理论原型。根据从原型和最近旧示例分类解释得出的预测,检验对这些测试刺激的分类反应。研究发现分类过程中存在显著的发育变化。对于最年幼的组,仅发现原型模型符合测试数据,而对于年龄较大的组,两个模型都能独立解释表现中显著的方差量。这一趋势不受训练与测试之间延迟的影响,也不受类别内变异性操作的影响。因此,特定示例模型作为对不明确分类的可行解释的出现似乎与所达到的发育水平有关。