Lindhard A, Schmidt L
Gynaekologisk-obstetrisk afdeling G., Københavns Amts Sygehus i Herlev.
Ugeskr Laeger. 1993 May 17;155(20):1550-3.
Three home pregnancy tests, Clearblue (Tjellesen), Clearblue one step (Tjellesen) and Predictor (Organon), were tested and compared with respect to sensitivity, specificity, prozone-phenomenon and convenience for use. In addition, they were compared with two well-known pregnancy tests, HCG-Novoclone (Novo) and HCG-Nostick (Organon), which are used in several hospitals and drugstores. All three home pregnancy tests were found to be in agreement with the instructions for use with regard to sensitivity and prozone phenomenon. One test, Clearblue one step, showed false positive results when LH was added. Clearblue was found to be laborious and unhygienic in performance. Predictor seems to be the test of choice.
对三种家用妊娠试验，即Clearblue（蒂勒森公司）、Clearblue一步法（蒂勒森公司）和Predictor（欧加农公司）进行了测试，并在灵敏度、特异性、前带现象和使用便利性方面进行了比较。此外，还将它们与两种在多家医院和药店使用的知名妊娠试验，即HCG - Novoclone（诺和诺德公司）和HCG - Nostick（欧加农公司）进行了比较。发现所有三种家用妊娠试验在灵敏度和前带现象方面均符合使用说明。有一种试验，即Clearblue一步法，在加入促黄体生成素（LH）时出现了假阳性结果。发现Clearblue操作繁琐且不卫生。Predictor似乎是首选的试验。
