Suppr超能文献

广泛脊柱手术后的脊髓或全身镇痛:鞘内注射吗啡与静脉注射芬太尼加可乐定的比较。

Spinal or systemic analgesia after extensive spinal surgery: comparison between intrathecal morphine and intravenous fentanyl plus clonidine.

作者信息

Bernard J M, Hommeril J L, Legendre M P, Passuti N, Pinaud M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 1993 May-Jun;5(3):231-6. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(93)90021-6.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare two different methods of postoperative analgesia after extensive spinal fusion.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized study.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty four adult patients undergoing scoliosis correction.

INTERVENTIONS

Before the end of surgery, patients received either intravenous clonidine 0.3 micrograms/kg/hr and fentanyl 25 micrograms/kg (after an hourly dose of clonidine 2.5 micrograms/kg) or intrathecal morphine 0.3 mg. A saline infusion was administered to patients receiving morphine intrathecally.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Pain and sedation scores, hemodynamic data, and blood gases were collected in the recovery room at tracheal extubation and then every 2 hours for the next 14 hours. Tracheal extubation was performed at the same time in both groups (i.e., an average of 4 hours after the analgesic regimens were started). Intrathecal morphine provided a mean score of 20 mm on a visual analog scale ranging from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (severe pain), but it resulted in increased PaCO2 at extubation (44 +/- 7 mmHg) and 2 hours later (42 +/- 7 mmHg). PaCO2 was greater than 50 mmHg in four patients receiving intrathecal morphine. Fentanyl-clonidine resulted in equipotent analgesia but was accompanied by sedation (sleeping but arousal by light tactile stimulation) and moderate hypotension (up to 69 +/- 9 mmHg for mean arterial pressure).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that there is a major risk of respiratory depression with a single intrathecal dose of morphine 0.3 mg to control postoperative pain after scoliosis surgery. Systemic clonidine-fentanyl may be a possible approach to the postoperative pain treatment of this surgery.

摘要

研究目的

比较广泛脊柱融合术后两种不同的镇痛方法。

设计

双盲、随机研究。

地点

大学附属医院。

患者

24例接受脊柱侧弯矫正的成年患者。

干预措施

手术结束前,患者分别接受静脉输注可乐定0.3微克/千克/小时和芬太尼25微克/千克(每小时先给予可乐定2.5微克/千克),或鞘内注射吗啡0.3毫克。接受鞘内吗啡注射的患者同时给予生理盐水输注。

测量指标及主要结果

在恢复室气管拔管时以及随后14小时内每2小时收集疼痛和镇静评分、血流动力学数据及血气指标。两组同时进行气管拔管(即镇痛方案开始后平均4小时)。鞘内注射吗啡后,视觉模拟评分平均为20毫米(范围从0毫米(无疼痛)至100毫米(剧痛)),但导致拔管时(44±7毫米汞柱)及2小时后(42±7毫米汞柱)PaCO2升高。4例接受鞘内吗啡注射的患者PaCO2大于50毫米汞柱。芬太尼-可乐定产生等效镇痛效果,但伴有镇静(睡眠状态但对轻触觉刺激有反应)及中度低血压(平均动脉压降至69±9毫米汞柱)。

结论

本研究表明,脊柱侧弯手术后单次鞘内注射0.3毫克吗啡控制术后疼痛存在呼吸抑制的重大风险。可乐定-芬太尼全身用药可能是该手术术后疼痛治疗的一种可行方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验