Suppr超能文献

霉菌毒素检测的可靠性——最新情况

Reliability of mycotoxin assays--an update.

作者信息

Horwitz W, Albert R, Nesheim S

机构信息

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Washington, DC 20204.

出版信息

J AOAC Int. 1993 May-Jun;76(3):461-91.

PMID:8318839
Abstract

The precision parameters of the method-performance (collaborative) studies for mycotoxins published in the literature through 1991 have been recalculated on a uniform basis by following the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry protocol. About 80% of the 793 accepted assays for mycotoxins, almost all of which have been conducted by thin-layer chromatography (TLC), liquid chromatography (LC), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), exhibit relative standard deviations among laboratories (RSDR) that are less than 2 times the values predicted from the Horwitz equation: RSDR, % = 2(1-0.5log10C) where C is the concentration expressed as a decimal fraction. The precision of TLC and LC methods is about the same, but that of ELISA is somewhat poorer. For those commodities for which sufficient data exist to provide a meaningful comparison, the methods applied to cottonseed products have the best precision and corn the worst, with peanuts intermediate. Overall, however, the primary factor affecting RSDR is concentration, more or less independent of analyte, method, matrix, and age of the study. If it is assumed that the test results are normally distributed and that an RSDR of 50% is the point where effective control of the results begins to be lost (a value equivalent to the production of 2% false-negative values), then relying on the Horwitz curve, the limit of quantitative measurement is the single digit, i.e., 5, micrograms/kg (10(-9); ppb) concentration for solid food commodities. Such a value must be considered as a limit applicable to a single analyte, aflatoxin B1, and not as a mean, and not applicable to the sum of the individual components, each of whose associated standard deviation would lie in the unacceptable region. Enforcement of a 5 micrograms aflatoxin B1/kg limit, under the assumptions made, requires that a responsible manufacturer and a prudent regulator operate at opposite extremes of tolerance limits: e.g., the producer at 2 micrograms/kg and the consumer at 10. A proposed Codex "maximum level" of 0.05 micrograms aflatoxin M1/kg milk cannot be supported by the available data applied in an interlaboratory enforcement environment. These conclusions are also supported by an examination of the reported data from the ongoing, large-scale proficiency studies routinely performed by the American Oil Chemists' Society and the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

摘要

已按照国际纯粹与应用化学联合会的协议,在统一基础上重新计算了截至1991年发表在文献中的霉菌毒素方法性能(协作)研究的精密度参数。在793项被认可的霉菌毒素检测方法中,约80%(几乎所有检测均通过薄层色谱法(TLC)、液相色谱法(LC)和酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)进行)显示实验室间相对标准偏差(RSDR)小于根据霍维茨方程预测值的2倍:RSDR(%)=2(1 - 0.5log₁₀C),其中C是以小数形式表示的浓度。TLC和LC方法的精密度大致相同,但ELISA的精密度稍差。对于有足够数据可进行有意义比较的那些商品,应用于棉籽产品的方法精密度最佳,玉米最差,花生居中。然而,总体而言,影响RSDR的主要因素是浓度,或多或少与分析物、方法、基质及研究年限无关。如果假设测试结果呈正态分布,且RSDR为50%是开始失去对结果有效控制的点(该值相当于产生2%的假阴性值),那么依据霍维茨曲线,定量测量限对于固体食品商品是个位数,即5微克/千克(10⁻⁹;ppb)浓度。这样的值必须被视为适用于单一分析物黄曲霉毒素B1的限值,而非均值,也不适用于各单个成分之和,因为每个成分的相关标准偏差都将处于不可接受区域。在上述假设下,执行5微克黄曲霉毒素B1/千克的限值要求负责的制造商和审慎的监管机构在容忍限的相反极端操作:例如,生产商为2微克/千克,消费者为10微克/千克。食品法典委员会提议的0.05微克黄曲霉毒素M1/千克牛奶的“最高限量”在实验室间执行环境中应用现有数据无法得到支持。美国油脂化学家协会和国际癌症研究机构定期进行的正在进行的大规模能力验证研究报告的数据检查也支持了这些结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验