Suppr超能文献

用于监管目的的分析方法的性能特征。第二部分。农药制剂。

Performance characteristics of methods of analysis used for regulatory purposes. Part II. Pesticide formulations.

作者信息

Horwitz W, Albert R

机构信息

Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Washington, DC 20204.

出版信息

J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1991 Sep-Oct;74(5):718-44.

PMID:1783583
Abstract

The precision parameters of the method-performance (collaborative) studies published in the AOAC Journal from 1915 through 1990 for pesticide formulations have been recalculated on a uniform basis by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry 1987 protocol. About 93% of the 953 accepted assays, which are predominantly gravimetric (G), volumetric (V), and gas (GC) and liquid (LC) chromatographic methods, exhibit relative standard deviations among laboratories (RSDR) that are generally less than 2 times the values predicted from the Horwitz equation: RSDR (%) = 2 exp (1-0.5 log C), where C is the concentration expressed as a decimal fraction. UV, VIS, and IR spectrophotometric (S) methods are somewhat poorer, with about 80% of the reported RSDR values less than twice the predicted RSDR value. The precision parameters of pesticide formulations analyzed by the older methods (G, V, GC) are equivalent to those previously found for drug preparations in the same concentration range; the precision parameters of pesticide formulations analyzed by LC and S are somewhat poorer. Overall, however, the precision parameters of pesticide formulations are generally independent of analyte, method, and matrix, and are primarily a function of concentration. The method-acceptability decisions of the AOAC for pesticide formulations during the past 75 years can be approximated retrospectively by using a criterion for RSDR that is less than 2 times the RSDR calculated from the Horwitz equation.

摘要

国际纯粹与应用化学联合会1987年的协议对1915年至1990年发表在《AOAC杂志》上的农药制剂方法性能(协作)研究的精密度参数进行了统一重新计算。在953项被接受的分析方法中,约93%主要是重量法(G)、容量法(V)、气相色谱法(GC)和液相色谱法(LC),其实验室间相对标准偏差(RSDR)通常小于根据霍维茨方程预测值的2倍:RSDR(%)=2 exp(1 - 0.5 log C),其中C是以小数表示的浓度。紫外、可见和红外分光光度法(S)稍差一些,约80%报告的RSDR值小于预测RSDR值的两倍。用较老方法(G、V、GC)分析的农药制剂的精密度参数与先前在相同浓度范围内药物制剂的精密度参数相当;用LC和S分析的农药制剂的精密度参数稍差。然而,总体而言,农药制剂的精密度参数通常与分析物、方法和基质无关,主要是浓度的函数。过去75年中AOAC对农药制剂的方法可接受性判定可以通过使用一个RSDR标准进行回顾性近似,该标准小于根据霍维茨方程计算的RSDR的2倍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验