Suppr超能文献

房室结折返。临床、电生理及治疗方面的考量。

Atrioventricular nodal reentry. Clinical, electrophysiological, and therapeutic considerations.

作者信息

Akhtar M, Jazayeri M R, Sra J, Blanck Z, Deshpande S, Dhala A

机构信息

Sinai Samaritan Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wis. 53233.

出版信息

Circulation. 1993 Jul;88(1):282-95. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.1.282.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry is a relatively common cause of regular, narrow QRS tachycardia. The underlying basis for this arrhythmia is functional (and anatomic) duality of pathways in the region of the AV node, although the exact boundaries of the reentrant circuit have not been convincingly defined. During the more common type of AV nodal reentry (seen in approximately 90% of cases), a slow conducting pathway is used in the anterograde direction, and a fast pathway is operative in the retrograde direction. In the uncommon form, the direction of impulse propagation within the reentrant circuit is reversed. In this article, the clinical, ECG, and electrophysiological features of AV nodal reentry as well as approaches to therapy are discussed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinical diagnosis may be made from the surface ECG. In the common type of AV nodal reentry, the P wave is obscured by the QRS or may be present in its terminal portion. The P wave in the uncommon form occurs late (i.e., in or after the T wave), producing a pattern of long RP and short PR. Both forms of AV nodal reentry are controllable with various therapeutic modalities. For acute termination, adenosine is probably the ideal agent. Prevention of recurrences can be achieved with several pharmacological agents, including beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and class Ia, Ic, and III antiarrhythmic agents. Curative therapy is now available with a variety of nonpharmacological methods. However, the most promising therapy at the present time is catheter modification of the AV node by ablation of either the fast or slow pathway, using radiofrequency energy. Ablation of the fast pathway carries a higher risk of second- or third-degree AV block. Slow pathway ablation, by providing a high rate of success and minimal risk of AV block, seems to be a more acceptable initial approach.

CONCLUSIONS

AV nodal reentry is a common cause of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, and a precise diagnosis can be made with intracardiac electrophysiological evaluation. Although the arrhythmia responds to a variety of antiarrhythmic agents, curative therapy can now be offered with catheter modification of the AV node using radiofrequency energy. At the time of this writing, it seems that catheter modification of the AV node is rapidly becoming the therapy of initial choice in patients with symptomatic AV nodal reentrant tachycardia requiring treatment.

摘要

背景

房室结折返是规则窄QRS波心动过速相对常见的病因。尽管折返环的确切边界尚未得到令人信服的界定,但这种心律失常的潜在基础是房室结区域传导通路的功能性(和解剖学上的)双重性。在更常见的房室结折返类型(约90%的病例可见)中,前向传导使用慢传导通路,逆向传导使用快传导通路。在不常见的形式中,折返环内冲动传播的方向相反。本文讨论了房室结折返的临床、心电图和电生理特征以及治疗方法。

方法和结果

临床诊断可根据体表心电图做出。在常见的房室结折返类型中,P波被QRS波掩盖或可能出现在其终末部分。不常见形式的P波出现较晚(即T波中或T波之后),产生长RP和短PR的图形。两种形式的房室结折返都可用多种治疗方式控制。对于急性终止,腺苷可能是理想的药物。几种药物可用于预防复发,包括β受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂以及Ia类、Ic类和III类抗心律失常药物。现在有多种非药物方法可进行根治性治疗。然而,目前最有前景的治疗方法是使用射频能量通过消融快或慢传导通路对房室结进行导管改良。消融快传导通路导致二度或三度房室传导阻滞的风险较高。慢传导通路消融成功率高且房室传导阻滞风险极小,似乎是更可接受的初始治疗方法。

结论

房室结折返是阵发性室上性心动过速的常见病因,通过心内电生理评估可做出准确诊断。尽管这种心律失常对多种抗心律失常药物有反应,但现在可通过使用射频能量对房室结进行导管改良来提供根治性治疗。在撰写本文时,对于有症状的需要治疗的房室结折返性心动过速患者,房室结导管改良似乎正迅速成为首选治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验