Suppr超能文献

根治性颈清扫术与保守性颈清扫术的比较。

A comparison of radical and conservative neck dissection.

作者信息

Bier J, Schlums D, Metelmann H, Howaldt H P, Pitz H

机构信息

Clinic for Maxillofacial Surgery, Clinicum Rudolf Virchow, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993 Apr;22(2):102-7. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80812-4.

Abstract

A review is presented of the confusing terminology applied to the various types of neck dissection. It is recommended that the terms "conservative" and "radical" be based on clear definitions. The fourth prospective, randomized DOSAK therapy study deals with the controversial issue of radical as compared with conservative neck dissection. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity who had not been treated before were randomized and stratified according to the DOSAK treatment-dependent prognostic index (TPI). At present, 104 patients have been evaluated, of whom 48 had radical neck dissection, and 56 conservative neck dissection. Tumor location and patient age and sex are equally divided in both therapy groups. After an average follow-up time of 460 days, the relative mortality for both therapy groups is 23%. At this stage, there is no difference between the two groups in the percentage of patients with complete remission or in the percentage of patients alive. At this stage, there appears to be no difference between the two groups with regard to patient survival or recurrent disease.

摘要

本文对应用于各种类型颈部清扫术的令人困惑的术语进行了综述。建议“保守性”和“根治性”术语应基于明确的定义。第四项前瞻性随机DOSAK治疗研究涉及根治性颈部清扫术与保守性颈部清扫术相比这一有争议的问题。未接受过治疗的口腔鳞状细胞癌(SCC)患者根据DOSAK治疗相关预后指数(TPI)进行随机分组和分层。目前,已评估了104例患者,其中48例行根治性颈部清扫术,56例行保守性颈部清扫术。两个治疗组的肿瘤位置、患者年龄和性别分布均等。平均随访460天后,两个治疗组的相对死亡率均为23%。在此阶段,两组在完全缓解患者百分比或存活患者百分比方面没有差异。在此阶段,两组在患者生存率或复发性疾病方面似乎没有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验