Litzelman D K, Dittus R S, Miller M E, Tierney W M
Regenstrief Institute for Health Care, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, IN 46202.
J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Jun;8(6):311-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02600144.
To improve compliance with computer-generated reminders to perform fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), mammography, and cervical Papanicolaou (Pap) testing.
Six-month prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Academic primary care general internal medicine practice.
Thirty-one general internal medicine faculty, 145 residents, and 5,407 patients with scheduled visits who were eligible for any of the three cancer screening protocols.
Primary care teams of internal medicine residents and faculty received either routine computer reminders (control) or the same remainders to which they were required to circle one of four responses: 1) "done/order today," 2) "not applicable to this patient," 3) "patient refused," or 4) "next visit."
Intervention physicians complied more frequently than control physicians with all remainders combined (46% vs 38%, respectively, p = 0.002) and separately with remainders for FOBT (61% vs 49%, p = 0.0007) and mammography (54% vs 47%, p = 0.036) but not cervical Pap testing (21% vs 18%, p = 0.2). Intervention residents responded significantly more often than control residents to all reminders together and separately to reminders for FOBT and mammography but not Pap testing. There was no significant difference between intervention and control faculty, but the compliance rate for control faculty was significantly higher than the rate for control residents for all reminders together and separately for FOBT but not mammography or Pap testing. The intervention's effect was greatest for patients > or = 70 years old, with significant results for all tests, together and singly, for residents but not faculty. Intervention physicians felt that the reminders were not applicable 21% of the time (due to inadequate data in patient's electronic medical records) and stated that their patients refused 10% of the time.
Requiring physicians to respond to computer-generated reminders improved their compliance with preventive care protocols, especially for elderly patients for whom control physicians' compliance was the lowest. However, 100% compliance with cancer screening remainders will be unattainable due to incomplete data and patient refusal.
提高对计算机生成的进行粪便潜血试验(FOBT)、乳房X线摄影和宫颈巴氏试验提醒的依从性。
为期6个月的前瞻性随机对照试验。
学术性初级保健普通内科诊所。
31名普通内科教员、145名住院医师以及5407名符合三种癌症筛查方案中任何一种的预约就诊患者。
内科住院医师和教员组成的初级保健团队要么收到常规计算机提醒(对照组),要么收到同样的提醒,且被要求从以下四种回复中圈选其一:1)“已完成/今日已开单”,2)“不适用于该患者”,3)“患者拒绝”,或4)“下次就诊时进行”。
干预组医师对所有提醒的总体依从率高于对照组医师(分别为46%和38%,p = 0.002),对FOBT提醒的依从率(61%对49%,p = 0.0007)和乳房X线摄影提醒的依从率(54%对47%,p = 0.036)也更高,但对宫颈巴氏试验提醒的依从率无差异(21%对18%,p = 0.2)。干预组住院医师对所有提醒的回复频率显著高于对照组住院医师,对FOBT和乳房X线摄影提醒的回复频率也分别更高,但对巴氏试验提醒的回复频率无差异。干预组和对照组教员之间无显著差异,但对照组教员对所有提醒的总体依从率以及对FOBT提醒的依从率显著高于对照组住院医师,对乳房X线摄影或巴氏试验提醒的依从率则无差异。干预措施对70岁及以上患者的效果最佳,住院医师对所有检查(总体及单项)均有显著效果,教员则不然。干预组医师认为提醒不适用的情况占21%(原因是患者电子病历数据不完整),称患者拒绝的情况占10%。
要求医师对计算机生成的提醒做出回复可提高他们对预防保健方案的依从性,尤其是对老年患者,而对照组医师对老年患者的依从性最低。然而,由于数据不完整和患者拒绝,要实现对癌症筛查提醒100%的依从性是不可能达到的。