Agonie C, Gorea A
Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, René Descartes University, Paris, France.
J Opt Soc Am A. 1993 Jun;10(6):1341-52. doi: 10.1364/josaa.10.001341.
The equivalent luminance contrast (EqLC) of red-green drifting stimuli was assessed by three independent methods. The first method [method (a)] consisted in adjusting the luminance contrast of a yellow, equichromatic stimulus to match the direction-discrimination performances that were obtained with a red-green, equiluminant stimulus. The second method [method (b)] was a replica of the standard motion-cancellation technique proposed by Cavanagh et al. [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 894 (1984)]. The third method [method (c)] consisted in adjusting the luminance contrast of the same yellow, equichromatic stimulus as in method (a) to match the perceived speed of the red-green, equiluminant stimulus. The three estimated EqLC's are all different. It is argued that differences between EqLC's assessed by means of methods (a) and (b) result from unbalanced interactions between the chromatic and achromatic, directional-sensitive mechanisms and that differences between EqLC's assessed by means of methods (a) and (c) reveal unequal transfer efficiencies from the directional to the speed-processing stages in the chromatic and achromatic pathways.
通过三种独立方法评估了红-绿漂移刺激的等效亮度对比度(EqLC)。第一种方法[方法(a)]是调整黄色等色刺激的亮度对比度,以匹配使用红-绿等亮度刺激所获得的方向辨别性能。第二种方法[方法(b)]是卡瓦纳等人[《美国光学学会志A》1, 894 (1984)]提出的标准运动消除技术的复制品。第三种方法[方法(c)]是调整与方法(a)中相同的黄色等色刺激的亮度对比度,以匹配红-绿等亮度刺激的感知速度。三种估计的EqLC均不相同。有人认为,通过方法(a)和(b)评估的EqLC之间的差异是由于颜色和非颜色方向敏感机制之间的不平衡相互作用导致的,而通过方法(a)和(c)评估的EqLC之间的差异则揭示了颜色和非颜色通路中从方向处理阶段到速度处理阶段的不等效传递效率。