Suppr超能文献

[Prospective comparative studies as tools for quality assurance. Important when laparoscopic techniques are introduced].

作者信息

Buanes T, Høgevold H E, Raeder M G

机构信息

Gastroenterologisk avdeling, Kirurgisk klinikk, Ullevål sykehus, Oslo.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1993 Jun 20;113(16):1978-81.

PMID:8322345
Abstract

During the first two years of laparoscopic surgery altogether 200 cholecystectomy and 40 appendectomy patients were included in prospective, comparative studies. The stay in hospital averaged two days after laparoscopic versus seven days after open cholecystectomy. Days away from work postoperatively averaged nine days after laparoscopic, versus 28 days after open cholecystectomy. After appendectomy, the stay in hospital was reduced from three to one day and absence from work from 14 days in the open surgery group to seven days in the laparoscopic group. Clear advantages have thus been documented in the groups with mini-invasive treatment, since only 5% experienced postoperative complications after laparoscopic treatment, as against 11% after open cholecystectomy (p < 0.02).

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验