• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Prospective comparative studies as tools for quality assurance. Important when laparoscopic techniques are introduced].

作者信息

Buanes T, Høgevold H E, Raeder M G

机构信息

Gastroenterologisk avdeling, Kirurgisk klinikk, Ullevål sykehus, Oslo.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1993 Jun 20;113(16):1978-81.

PMID:8322345
Abstract

During the first two years of laparoscopic surgery altogether 200 cholecystectomy and 40 appendectomy patients were included in prospective, comparative studies. The stay in hospital averaged two days after laparoscopic versus seven days after open cholecystectomy. Days away from work postoperatively averaged nine days after laparoscopic, versus 28 days after open cholecystectomy. After appendectomy, the stay in hospital was reduced from three to one day and absence from work from 14 days in the open surgery group to seven days in the laparoscopic group. Clear advantages have thus been documented in the groups with mini-invasive treatment, since only 5% experienced postoperative complications after laparoscopic treatment, as against 11% after open cholecystectomy (p < 0.02).

摘要

相似文献

1
[Prospective comparative studies as tools for quality assurance. Important when laparoscopic techniques are introduced].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1993 Jun 20;113(16):1978-81.
2
[The influence of obesity on early results and quality of life of patients after chosen operations performed by laparoscopic or open methods].[肥胖对经腹腔镜或开放手术治疗的特定手术后患者早期疗效及生活质量的影响]
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2007;53(3):119-27.
3
Introduction of laparoscopic techniques in gastrointestinal surgery: experience at a Norwegian university hospital as revealed by prospective comparative studies.腹腔镜技术在胃肠外科手术中的应用:前瞻性对比研究揭示的挪威某大学医院的经验
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993 Feb;3(1):21-8.
4
[Cost-benefit calculations in laparoscopic surgery. Substantial total benefits, but extra expenses for hospitals are required--reversed effect].[腹腔镜手术中的成本效益计算。总效益显著,但医院需要额外费用——效果相反]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1993 Jun 20;113(16):2007-9.
5
[Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which factors influence the decision between the surgical techniques?].[腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:哪些因素影响手术技术的选择?]
Zentralbl Chir. 2005 Feb;130(1):48-54. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-836240.
6
[Laparoscopic appendectomy after the learning curve].[学习曲线后的腹腔镜阑尾切除术]
Cir Pediatr. 2008 Jul;21(3):167-72.
7
Complications in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: a prospective comparative trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术和开腹胆囊切除术的并发症:一项前瞻性对比试验。
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996 Aug;6(4):266-72.
8
Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的安全性、有效性、成本及发病率:对228例连续患者的前瞻性分析
Am Surg. 1993 Jan;59(1):23-7.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
10
[Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in suspected acute appendicitis in female patients].[女性疑似急性阑尾炎患者的腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术对比]
Ann Ital Chir. 2002 Jan-Feb;73(1):59-63.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.