Levine O S, Ortiz E, Contreras R, Lagos R, Vial P, Misraji A, Ferreccio C, Espinoza C, Adlerstein L, Herrera P
Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201.
Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Jun 1;137(11):1221-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116624.
Cost-benefit analyses can be integral to the evaluation of interventions in developing countries. The authors compare the potential benefits to the Chilean Ministry of Health, in terms of treatment costs averted, by prevention of Haemophilus influenzae type b (HIB) invasive disease, with the costs of adding HIB conjugate vaccine to the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) immunization routinely administered to infants. In their basecase model, over a 10-year period (1991-2000), vaccination against HIB will prevent 1,229 cases of HIB invasive disease, including 713 cases of meningitis, 107 of whom would suffer severe, long-term sequelae, and between 29 and 116 deaths. Assuming a cost of US$1 for a full three-dose regimen of vaccine, the benefit/cost ratio of 1.66, with a net discounted savings of over $403,225, illustrates that HIB vaccine can be cost-beneficial. Sensitivity analyses which alter each of the variables in the analysis indicate that if the true incidence of HIB disease is twice the published rate, then three doses of vaccine remains cost-beneficial at US#3.
成本效益分析对于评估发展中国家的干预措施至关重要。作者比较了预防b型流感嗜血杆菌(HIB)侵袭性疾病给智利卫生部带来的潜在益处(以避免的治疗成本衡量)与在常规给婴儿接种的白喉-破伤风-百日咳(DTP)疫苗中添加HIB结合疫苗的成本。在其基础模型中,在10年期间(1991 - 2000年),接种HIB疫苗将预防1229例HIB侵袭性疾病,包括713例脑膜炎,其中107例将遭受严重的长期后遗症,以及29至116例死亡。假设一剂完整的三剂次疫苗接种成本为1美元,效益/成本比为1.66,净贴现节省超过403,225美元,这表明HIB疫苗具有成本效益。对分析中的每个变量进行改变的敏感性分析表明,如果HIB疾病的实际发病率是公布发病率的两倍,那么三剂疫苗在3美元时仍具有成本效益。