• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[支气管哮喘快速免疫疗法安全性与有效性的影响因素分析]

[The analysis of factors contributing to the safety and efficacy of rush immunotherapy in bronchial asthma].

作者信息

Nagata M, Tabe K, Yamamoto H, Maruo H, Kiuch H, Sakamoto Y, Yamamoto K, Dohi Y

机构信息

Second Department of Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical School.

出版信息

Arerugi. 1993 May;42(5):628-34.

PMID:8323461
Abstract

In order to establish guidelines for the optimal use of rush immunotherapy (RI) in mite-sensitive adult bronchial asthmatics, we clinically analyzed 38 cases treated with RI. In all cases, it was possible to reach a maintenance dose greater than 0.10 ml of 1/10 solution of house dust (HD) within 10 days. Most of the systemic reactions occurred after doses greater than 0.15 ml of 1/10 solution. The patients who showed the maximum size of skin reaction > or = 8 cm were susceptible to systemic reactions. Prior to the occurrence of asthma, most cases complained of some prodrome of airway irritation. The clinical efficacy of RI was significantly lower in patients whose FEV1% was < 70%, and no difference was observed between patients whose maintenance dose was 0.10 ml and those whose maintenance dose was greater than 0.20 ml. These results suggest: 1) RI should be performed on patients whose FEV1% is > or = 70%, 2) 0.10 ml of 1/10 solution is an optimal dose, 3) when a local skin reaction is > or = 8 cm in diameter and/or a prodrome of airway irritation occurs, one should be careful when increasing the dosage.

摘要

为了制定对尘螨敏感的成年支气管哮喘患者进行快速免疫疗法(RI)的最佳使用指南,我们对38例接受RI治疗的患者进行了临床分析。在所有病例中,均有可能在10天内达到大于0.10 ml的屋尘(HD)1/10溶液的维持剂量。大多数全身反应发生在剂量大于0.15 ml的1/10溶液之后。皮肤反应最大尺寸≥8 cm的患者易发生全身反应。在哮喘发作之前,大多数病例主诉有一些气道刺激的前驱症状。FEV1%<70%的患者中RI的临床疗效显著较低,维持剂量为0.10 ml的患者与维持剂量大于0.20 ml的患者之间未观察到差异。这些结果表明:1)RI应在FEV1%≥70%的患者中进行;2)0.10 ml的1/10溶液是最佳剂量;3)当局部皮肤反应直径≥8 cm和/或出现气道刺激的前驱症状时,增加剂量时应谨慎。

相似文献

1
[The analysis of factors contributing to the safety and efficacy of rush immunotherapy in bronchial asthma].[支气管哮喘快速免疫疗法安全性与有效性的影响因素分析]
Arerugi. 1993 May;42(5):628-34.
2
[A trial of new protocol of rush immunotherapy with standardized mite antigen].[标准化螨抗原快速免疫疗法新方案的试验]
Arerugi. 1999 May;48(5):526-32.
3
[A clinical evaluation of clustered immunotherapy in house-dust-mite-sensitive adult bronchial asthma].[屋尘螨敏感型成人支气管哮喘的集群免疫治疗临床评估]
Arerugi. 1998 Apr;47(4):426-33.
4
[Predicting the clinical efficacy of house dust mite immunotherapy in bronchial asthmatics by multiple quantification analysis type II].
Arerugi. 1993 Dec;42(12):1771-5.
5
[Clinical significance of allergen specific immunotherapy in adult house-dust-mite-sensitive bronchial asthma: impact on disease severity and medical cost].成人屋尘螨敏感性支气管哮喘中变应原特异性免疫治疗的临床意义:对疾病严重程度和医疗费用的影响
Arerugi. 1999 Dec;48(12):1316-21.
6
[A clinical evaluation of rush immunotherapy in adult patients with severe bronchial asthma].[成人重度支气管哮喘患者快速免疫疗法的临床评估]
Arerugi. 1989 Dec;38(12):1319-26.
7
[A study to predict the clinical efficacy of house dust mite immunotherapy in bronchial asthmatics].[一项预测屋尘螨免疫疗法对支气管哮喘患者临床疗效的研究]
Arerugi. 1993 Apr;42(4):522-8.
8
[An evaluation of the long-term effect of clustered immunotherapy in house-dust-mite-sensitive adult bronchial asthma].[集群免疫疗法对屋尘螨敏感的成年支气管哮喘的长期疗效评估]
Arerugi. 2001 May;50(5):435-9.
9
Long-term analysis of allergen-specific T cell clones from patients with asthma treated with allergen rush immunotherapy.对接受变应原快速免疫疗法治疗的哮喘患者的变应原特异性T细胞克隆进行长期分析。
Cell Immunol. 1998 Nov 25;190(1):43-50. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1998.1391.
10
[Safety analysis of dust mite allergen for diagnosis and immunotherapy of asthma and rhinitis].[用于哮喘和鼻炎诊断及免疫治疗的尘螨变应原安全性分析]
Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi. 1999;17(5):274-6.