DeRouen T A, Murray J A, Owen W
Circulation. 1977 Feb;55(2):324-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.55.2.324.
Variability in coronary arteriogram readings was studied by having cine films from ten patients read by eleven readers. Three of the eleven subsequently met as an expert panel to provide a joint evaluation which could serve as a standard. Considerable variability was found between individual readers and between readers and the panel. The average standard deviation for estimation of any segmental stenosis by any single reader was 18%. Disagreement about the number of major vessels with a 70% stenosis occurred 31% of the time. Discrepancies were most likely to occur in analyzing distal arterial segments, in reading nonopacified segments, and during analysis of films showing more severe disease or having poorer technical quality. Recent experience in reading arteriograms seemed to be the most important characteristic in determining the accuracy of a reader. A protocol for the use of three readers is suggested.
通过让11名读者解读10名患者的冠状动脉造影片,研究了冠状动脉造影读数的变异性。11名读者中的3名随后组成专家小组进行联合评估,该评估可作为标准。发现个体读者之间以及读者与专家小组之间存在相当大的变异性。任何一位读者对任何节段性狭窄的估计平均标准差为18%。对于70%狭窄的主要血管数量存在分歧的情况占31%。差异最有可能出现在分析动脉远端节段、解读未显影节段以及分析显示病情更严重或技术质量较差的影片时。近期解读血管造影的经验似乎是决定读者准确性的最重要特征。建议采用由三名读者参与的方案。