Mori F, Favilli S, Zuppiroli A, Minneci C, Cupelli V, Manetti A, De Saint Pierre G
U.O. di Cardiologia, Ospedale Careggi, Firenze.
G Ital Cardiol. 1993 Mar;23(3):225-37.
The aim of this study was to assess the utility of Doppler echocardiography both at rest and during isotonic exercise in evaluating competition eligibility of patients with repaired coarctation of the aorta (CoAo).
Seventeen young patients (11 male, 6 female; mean age 17.1 +/- 7.9 years) with previous surgical repair of CoAo were examined. Mean follow-up after repair was 10.3 +/- 3.5 years. All patients underwent complete Echocardiographic examination (M-mode, 2D and Doppler) and an exercise test on an ergometric bicycle, with continuous wave Doppler monitoring of flow velocity in descending aorta, with a transducer positioned in the suprasternal notch. Peak and mean Doppler gradients in descending aorta were measured both at rest and during exercise, using the simplified Bernoulli equation. According to peak Doppler gradient at rest, patients were divided into two subgroups: Group IA = patients with peak gradient lower than 25 mmHg; Group IB = patients with peak gradient greater than 25 mmHg. Finally, 17 healthy subjects (Control Group), matched for age and body surface area, were examined.
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure both at rest and during exercise were not significantly different in the 3 groups. Patients of Group IB showed a significant increase of left ventricular mass (124.0 +/- 24.4 vs 85.8 +/- 24.1 g/m2, p < 0.01), and during exercise, a significant increase of peak gradient (68.3 +/- 27.2 vs 23.5 +/- 9.0 mmHg, p < 0.0001) and mean gradient (34.8 +/- 11.5 vs 11.9 +/- 5.0 mmHg, p < 0.0001) at the level of the descending aorta. In patients of Group IA, echocardiographic parameters were not different in comparison with the Control Group, whereas Doppler gradients during exercise were only slightly greater than those observed in the Control Group (peak gradient 36.9 +/- 13.0 vs 23.5 +/- 9.0 mmHg, p < 0.05; mean gradient 19.6 +/- 6.0 vs 11.9 +/- 5.0 mmHg, p < 0.05). However, 4 patients of Group IA showed a peak gradient during exercise greater than 40 mmHg (this value was equivalent to the mean value plus 2 Standard Deviations, observed in the Control Group) with the presence of diastolic flow, whereas exercise systolic blood pressure was lower than 200 mmHg.
Thus, as a result of this study aimed at evaluating competition eligibility in patients with repaired CoAo, two subgroups of patients have to be distinguished according to Doppler echocardiography results: a) patients with peak Doppler gradient at rest greater than 25 mmHg, for whom competition is forbidden; b) Patients with peak gradient lower than 25 mmHg who must be investigated with exercise Doppler echocardiography to exclude an abnormal increase of Doppler gradients, even if exercise blood pressure is within normal limits.
本研究的目的是评估静息状态下和等张运动期间多普勒超声心动图在评估主动脉缩窄(CoAo)修复术后患者参赛资格方面的效用。
对17例曾接受CoAo手术修复的年轻患者(11例男性,6例女性;平均年龄17.1±7.9岁)进行了检查。修复后的平均随访时间为10.3±3.5年。所有患者均接受了完整的超声心动图检查(M型、二维和多普勒)以及在测力计自行车上进行的运动试验,使用置于胸骨上切迹的换能器对降主动脉内的血流速度进行连续波多普勒监测。使用简化的伯努利方程测量静息状态下和运动期间降主动脉的峰值和平均多普勒梯度。根据静息状态下的峰值多普勒梯度,将患者分为两个亚组:IA组 = 峰值梯度低于25 mmHg的患者;IB组 = 峰值梯度高于25 mmHg的患者。最后,对17名年龄和体表面积匹配的健康受试者(对照组)进行了检查。
三组患者静息状态下和运动期间的收缩压和舒张压均无显著差异。IB组患者的左心室质量显著增加(124.0±24.4 vs 85.8±24.1 g/m2,p < 0.01),并且在运动期间,降主动脉水平的峰值梯度(68.3±27.2 vs 23.5±9.0 mmHg,p < 0.0001)和平均梯度(34.8±11.5 vs 11.9±5.0 mmHg,p < 0.0001)显著增加。在IA组患者中,超声心动图参数与对照组相比无差异,而运动期间的多普勒梯度仅略高于对照组观察到的值(峰值梯度36.9±13.0 vs 23.5±9.0 mmHg,p < 0.05;平均梯度19.6±6.0 vs 11.9±5.0 mmHg,p < 0.05)。然而,IA组中有4例患者在运动期间的峰值梯度大于40 mmHg(该值相当于对照组中观察到的平均值加2个标准差),伴有舒张期血流,而运动收缩压低于200 mmHg。
因此,作为本旨在评估CoAo修复术后患者参赛资格的研究结果,必须根据多普勒超声心动图结果区分出两组患者:a)静息状态下峰值多普勒梯度大于25 mmHg的患者,禁止其参赛;b)峰值梯度低于25 mmHg的患者,即使运动血压在正常范围内,也必须通过运动多普勒超声心动图进行检查,以排除多普勒梯度的异常增加。