Suppr超能文献

外源性促性腺激素与脉冲式促性腺激素释放激素用于低促性腺激素性闭经患者诱导排卵的比较。

Comparison of exogenous gonadotropins and pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone for induction of ovulation in hypogonadotropic amenorrhea.

作者信息

Martin K A, Hall J E, Adams J M, Crowley W F

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

出版信息

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993 Jul;77(1):125-9. doi: 10.1210/jcem.77.1.8325934.

Abstract

To compare the efficacy and safety of ovulation induction with exogenous gonadotropins vs. pulsatile GnRH in patients with hypogonadotropic amenorrhea, results from 30 patients in 111 cycles of gonadotropins and 41 patients in 118 cycles of pulsatile GnRH were analyzed retrospectively. Exogenous gonadotropins were administered using an individually adjusted protocol, using a starting dose of 150 IU. Pulsatile GnRH was delivered iv at a physiological frequency based upon our normative data. The doses administered ranged from 75-250 ng/kg. Preovulatory serum estradiol (E2) and luteal phase progesterone (P) levels were compared to those in normal cycling women (n = 87). The mean body mass index, age, and baseline gonadotropin levels were similar in the two groups. Overall ovulatory rates and conception rates per cycle and per patient were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the cumulative chance of conception after six cycles of treatment by life table analysis appeared to be higher with pulsatile GnRH treatment (96%) than with exogenous gonadotropins (72%). The risk of multiple gestation was also higher with exogenous gonadotropins (14.8% vs. 8.3%), although this was not statistically significant. All higher order multiple gestations (triplets or more) occurred in the gonadotropin-treated group. More than two dominant follicles were seen on ultrasound in 47.6% of gonadotropin-treated cycles compared to 18.9% of cycles with pulsatile GnRH treatment (P < 0.01). Three or more follicles were seen in 16.6% of the gonadotropin cycles compared to 5.4% with pulsatile GnRH (P < 0.05). No case of severe ovarian hyperstimulation was observed in either group, although the mean luteal phase ovarian size was significantly higher in the gonadotropin group (P < 0.05). Mean peak preovulatory E2 levels were significantly higher in the gonadotropin group (1684.5 +/- 124.4 vs. 1315.3 +/- 74.9 pmol/L; P < 0.05). The mean luteal phase P level 1 week after ovulation was significantly higher than normal in the gonadotropin group (84.9 +/- 10.8 vs. 61.1 +/- 3.2 nmol/L; P < 0.05), but was not significantly different from that in the pulsatile GnRH group (70.3 +/- 6.0 nmol/L). We conclude that pulsatile GnRH, when compared to exogenous gonadotropins, results in high rates of ovulation and conception, but a decreased risk of multiple folliculogenesis, higher order multiple gestations, and ovarian enlargement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

为比较外源性促性腺激素与脉冲式GnRH诱发低促性腺激素性闭经患者排卵的疗效及安全性,对111个周期使用促性腺激素的30例患者及118个周期使用脉冲式GnRH的41例患者的结果进行了回顾性分析。外源性促性腺激素采用个体化调整方案给药,起始剂量为150 IU。脉冲式GnRH根据我们的标准数据以生理频率静脉给药。给药剂量范围为75 - 250 ng/kg。将排卵前血清雌二醇(E2)和黄体期孕酮(P)水平与正常月经周期女性(n = 87)的水平进行比较。两组的平均体重指数、年龄及基线促性腺激素水平相似。两组每周期及每位患者的总体排卵率和受孕率无显著差异。然而,通过生命表分析,脉冲式GnRH治疗六个周期后的累积受孕几率(96%)似乎高于外源性促性腺激素治疗组(72%)。外源性促性腺激素导致多胎妊娠的风险也更高(14.8% 对8.3%),尽管这无统计学意义。所有高阶多胎妊娠(三胎或更多)均发生在促性腺激素治疗组。超声检查显示,47.6%的促性腺激素治疗周期有两个以上优势卵泡,而脉冲式GnRH治疗周期为18.9%(P < 0.01)。促性腺激素治疗周期中16.6%可见三个或更多卵泡,脉冲式GnRH治疗周期为5.4%(P < 0.05)。两组均未观察到严重卵巢过度刺激病例,尽管促性腺激素组黄体期卵巢平均大小显著更高(P < 0.05)。促性腺激素组排卵前E2峰值平均水平显著更高(1684.5 ± 124.4对1315.3 ± 74.9 pmol/L;P < 0.05)。促性腺激素组排卵后1周黄体期P平均水平显著高于正常(84.9 ± 10.8对61.1 ± 3.2 nmol/L;P < 0.05),但与脉冲式GnRH组无显著差异(70.3 ± 6.0 nmol/L)。我们得出结论,与外源性促性腺激素相比,脉冲式GnRH可导致高排卵率和受孕率,但多卵泡发育、高阶多胎妊娠及卵巢增大的风险降低。(摘要截选至400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验