Alper S, Parker K, Schloss P, Wisniewski L
Department of Special Education, University of Missouri-Columbia 65202.
Ment Retard. 1993 Jun;31(3):163-70.
Appropriate education guaranteed to children with disabilities under P.L. 94-142 has been translated by the courts to mean more than 180 days of education. There is now a strong legal precedent establishing the right to an extended school year (summer school) for students with severe disabilities. The courts have left open to interpretation, however, issues related to the program implementation. Descriptions of extended school year programs vary widely and include respite for parents, continuation of the regular school year curriculum, and remediation in skill areas. The only consensus seems to be that these programs should be tailored to individual needs. In the present article a systematic approach to curriculum development for students with severe disabilities enrolled in extended school year programs was described. This approach is (a) community driven, (b) consistent with each student's IEP objectives for the regular school year, (c) tailored to the individual student, and (d) consistent with current best practices of teaching functional skills performed by individuals without disabilities in a variety of integrated nonschool settings. Student progress data were presented.
根据第94 - 142号公法,为残疾儿童提供的适当教育已被法院解释为超过180天的教育。目前有一个强有力的法律先例,确立了重度残疾学生享有延长学年(暑期学校)的权利。然而,法院对与该项目实施相关的问题仍未作明确解释。延长学年项目的描述差异很大,包括为家长提供喘息机会、延续常规学年课程以及技能领域的补习。唯一的共识似乎是这些项目应根据个人需求进行调整。在本文中,描述了一种为参加延长学年项目的重度残疾学生制定课程的系统方法。这种方法是:(a) 以社区为导向;(b) 与每个学生常规学年的个别化教育计划目标一致;(c) 针对个别学生量身定制;(d) 与目前在各种综合非学校环境中为非残疾个体教授功能性技能的最佳实践一致。文中还展示了学生的进步数据。