Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死溶栓药物现有对比试验后仍未解决的问题。

Unresolved issues after the available comparative trials of thrombolytic agents in acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Collen D

机构信息

Center for Thrombosis and Vascular Research, University of Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Z Kardiol. 1993;82 Suppl 2:119-23.

PMID:8328188
Abstract

Although the results of GISSI-2/International Study and ISIS-3 have confirmed the safety of streptokinase, they do not contradict the view that early recanalization, inducible with a higher incidence with rt-PA, is a primary determinant of clinical outcome. A definitive answer to the question must come from large scale mortality studies of patients in whom the risk/benefit ratio of thrombolysis is not unacceptably high, in whom electrocardiographic criteria of infarction are unequivocal, and in whom treatment can be initiated early after the onset of symptoms with regimens that will induce not only early recanalization, but also sustained patency in infarct-related arteries.

摘要

尽管GISSI - 2/国际研究和ISIS - 3的结果证实了链激酶的安全性,但它们并不与以下观点相矛盾:早期再灌注(rt - PA诱导的发生率更高)是临床结果的主要决定因素。对于这个问题的明确答案必须来自大规模的死亡率研究,这些研究的对象是溶栓风险/效益比并非高得不可接受、梗死的心电图标准明确、且在症状发作后能尽早开始治疗的患者,所用治疗方案不仅能诱导早期再灌注,还能使梗死相关动脉持续通畅。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验