Kerrigan D C, Janes W W, Martin W A, Roe T J
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Jul;74(7):687-90. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90025-6.
A study was done to determine how well residents in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) believe their educational needs are being met in various clinical and didactic areas. Surveys were sent in April 1989 to the 814 persons on the 1989 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation resident physician registry. Residents were asked to rate how much experience they thought they were getting in their residency for each of 22 clinical and didactic topics such as stroke, spinal cord injury, head injury, prosthetics, chronic pain, sports medicine, pediatric rehabilitation, cardiopulmonary rehabilitation, electromyography, and physical modalities. In addition, they were asked to rate how much they believed they should be given with respect to these same topics. The response rate was 532 out of 814 (65%). Residents expected somewhat more than what they were getting overall; however, there were exaggerated discrepancies in a few specific areas. Residents believed they should be getting significantly more clinical and didactic experience in Industrial Medicine, Sports Medicine, Computer Applications, Therapeutic Injections, and Administration. The results should serve as guidelines for residency training and the study should serve as a model for future routine assessments.
一项研究旨在确定物理医学与康复（PM&R）专业的住院医师认为他们在各个临床和教学领域的教育需求得到满足的程度。1989年4月，向1989年美国物理医学与康复学会住院医师登记册上的814人发送了调查问卷。住院医师被要求对他们在住院期间在22个临床和教学主题（如中风、脊髓损伤、头部损伤、假肢、慢性疼痛、运动医学、儿科康复、心肺康复、肌电图和物理治疗方法）中的每一个主题所获得的经验进行评分。此外，他们还被要求对他们认为在这些相同主题上应该获得的经验进行评分。回复率为814人中的532人（65%）。住院医师总体上期望获得的经验比他们实际获得的略多；然而，在一些特定领域存在夸大的差异。住院医师认为他们应该在工业医学、运动医学、计算机应用、治疗性注射和行政管理方面获得显著更多的临床和教学经验。这些结果应作为住院医师培训的指导方针，该研究应作为未来常规评估的典范。
