Suppr超能文献

[伊拉地平缓释剂型与尼群地平个体内比较的昼夜降压作用及耐受性]

[Circadian antihypertensive action and tolerability of a sustained-release form of isradipine in an intra-individual comparison with nitrendipine].

作者信息

Lohmann F W, Welzel D, Burger K J

机构信息

I. Innere Abteilung, Krankenhaus Neukölln, Berlin-Neukölln.

出版信息

Arzneimittelforschung. 1993 May;43(5):522-5.

PMID:8328996
Abstract

Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a 4-week treatment each with the modified release formulation of the calcium antagonist isradipine (5 mg; Lomir SRO, CAS 75695-93-1) were compared with those of nitrendipine (20 mg) (both with morning intake) in 51 patients with mild to moderate hypertension using a double-blind, intraindividual crossover study. Blood pressure was measured over 24 h at the end of a 2-week placebo phase and after both treatment phases by means of a continuous ambulatory recording device. Upon statistical evaluation of all patients with 3 complete 24-h profiles (n = 44) and combined analysis of data from same treatments the following 24-h mean values were obtained: blood pressure (syst./diast.) was lowered from 151/98 mmHg to 141/91 mmHg by isradipine retard (IS) and to 141/92 mmHg by nitrendipine (NI), whereas heart rate remained nearly unchanged (78 vs 79 beats/min on both therapies). The 24-h profiles differed significantly between placebo and both therapies, the profile as a whole was more even on IS. Starting from a day-time mean value (6:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.) on placebo of 155/102 mmHg blood pressure was reduced by IS to 143/94 mmHg and by NI to 144/95 mmHg; the corresponding night-time mean values were; placebo 138/85 mmHg, IS 132/82 mmHg, NI 134/83 mmHg. If one compares the area under the blood pressure curves during the hours from 6 p.m. to 12 p.m. significant differences (2p = 0.0128) were found for systolic pressure and borderline significance (2p = 0.0668) for diastolic differences in favour of IS.

摘要

采用双盲、个体内交叉研究,比较了51例轻至中度高血压患者分别服用钙拮抗剂伊拉地平缓释制剂(5mg;Lomir SRO,CAS 75695-93-1)和尼群地平(20mg)(均晨起服用)4周的降压疗效和耐受性。在为期2周的安慰剂阶段结束时以及两个治疗阶段后,使用连续动态记录装置测量24小时血压。对所有有3个完整24小时血压记录的患者(n = 44)进行统计学评估,并对相同治疗的数据进行综合分析,得出以下24小时平均值:伊拉地平缓释制剂(IS)使血压(收缩压/舒张压)从151/98mmHg降至141/91mmHg,尼群地平(NI)使其降至141/92mmHg,而心率几乎保持不变(两种治疗均为78次/分钟对79次/分钟)。安慰剂与两种治疗的24小时血压曲线存在显著差异,IS治疗的血压曲线整体更平稳。从安慰剂阶段白天(上午6:00至晚上10:00)的平均值155/102mmHg开始,IS将血压降至143/94mmHg,NI降至144/95mmHg;相应的夜间平均值分别为:安慰剂138/85mmHg,IS 132/82mmHg,NI 134/83mmHg。如果比较下午6点至午夜12点期间血压曲线下的面积,收缩压有显著差异(P = 0.0128),舒张压有临界显著差异(P = 0.0668),IS更具优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验