Suppr超能文献

儿童虐待报告:全国发病率调查的二次分析

Reporting of child maltreatment: a secondary analysis of the National Incidence Surveys.

作者信息

Ards S, Harrell A

机构信息

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 1993 May-Jun;17(3):337-44. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(93)90056-b.

Abstract

Reports to CPS agencies of child maltreatment cases come from a variety of community sources. Which kinds of cases are underreported, overreported, or not reported at all, and why? We address these questions by examining the discrepancies between cases known to CPS agencies and those known to professionals who regularly come into contact with children: teachers, hospital personnel, law enforcement officers, court personnel, and social service workers. The analysis is based on the 1980 and 1986 National Study of the Incidence and Prevalence of Child Abuse and Neglect. Our research yielded three major findings. First, older victims were less likely than younger victims to be known to CPS agencies. Second, there is a hierarchy of type of abuse reported to CPS agencies, with sexual abuse being at the top of the list and educational neglect at the bottom of the list. Third, the victims' race, sex, and income did not play a role in whether or not a case was reported to CPS agencies.

摘要

向儿童保护服务机构报告的虐待儿童案件来自各种社区渠道。哪些类型的案件报告不足、报告过度或根本未被报告,原因是什么?我们通过研究儿童保护服务机构已知的案件与经常接触儿童的专业人员(教师、医院工作人员、执法人员、法院工作人员和社会服务工作者)已知的案件之间的差异来解决这些问题。该分析基于1980年和1986年全国虐待和忽视儿童发生率及患病率研究。我们的研究得出了三个主要发现。第一,与较年轻的受害者相比,年龄较大的受害者被儿童保护服务机构知晓的可能性较小。第二,向儿童保护服务机构报告的虐待类型存在等级制度,性虐待排在首位,教育忽视排在末位。第三,受害者的种族、性别和收入在案件是否向儿童保护服务机构报告方面不起作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验