Manolis A S
Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, New England Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Herz. 1993 Jun;18(3):143-54.
Syncope is a symptom of a wide variety of underlying disorders. As such, it is a common and challenging clinical problem with different pathophysiologic mechanisms and prognostic implications. The clinical spectrum of etiologies of syncope includes disorders classified as cardiovascular, noncardiovascular and unexplained. Generally, in patients in whom an initial diagnosis can be made, in the majority this is usually accomplished by a detailed history and thorough physical examination, that includes orthostatic vital signs and carotid sinus pressure. In the remaining cases, that can be as many as 50% of patients, the objective of subsequent noninvasive evaluation is to diagnose the cause of syncope, but also to stratify the patients in those with and those without underlying structural heart disease, and selectively apply additional more specialized or invasive tests. Cardiac syncope, and particularly when ventricular tachycardia is the cause, has the worst prognosis with 20 to 30% one-year mortality. This realization prompts rigorous effort in diagnosing or excluding an arrhythmic cause and applying aggressive therapy in such high risk patients. Thus, if after conventional noninvasive testing the etiology of syncope remains elusive in patients with underlying structural heart disease, electrophysiologic studies should be performed. Electrophysiologic studies identify a potential cause in up to two thirds of these patients. Treatment based on electrophysiologic diagnoses is effective in preventing syncope recurrences but may also reduce cardiac mortality. In patients without structural heart disease, head-up tilt testing has been very useful in diagnosing neurally mediated syncope and guiding its therapy. Finally in patients with recurrent syncope which remains unexplained despite extensive testing, a loop monitor may record the rhythm during an episode and provide or exclude a diagnosis. The discussion in this article serves as a brief overview of the clinical spectrum of syncope and describes a stepwise and systematic approach to diagnosis of this common, albeit challenging, medical problem, with emphasis on recent developments in the syncope work-up.
晕厥是多种潜在疾病的症状。因此,它是一个常见且具有挑战性的临床问题,存在不同的病理生理机制和预后影响。晕厥病因的临床范围包括归类为心血管性、非心血管性和不明原因的疾病。一般来说,在能够做出初步诊断的患者中,大多数情况下通常通过详细的病史和全面的体格检查来完成,其中包括直立位生命体征和颈动脉窦按压。在其余病例中,可能多达50%的患者,后续无创评估的目的不仅是诊断晕厥的原因,还要将患者分为有潜在结构性心脏病和无潜在结构性心脏病的两组,并选择性地应用更多专门或侵入性的检查。心源性晕厥,尤其是当室性心动过速为病因时,预后最差,一年死亡率为20%至30%。这一认识促使人们在诊断或排除心律失常病因以及对这类高危患者进行积极治疗方面做出严格努力。因此,如果在传统无创检查后,有潜在结构性心脏病的患者晕厥病因仍不明确,应进行电生理检查。电生理检查在多达三分之二的这类患者中可确定潜在病因。基于电生理诊断的治疗在预防晕厥复发方面有效,但也可能降低心脏死亡率。在无结构性心脏病的患者中,头高位倾斜试验在诊断神经介导性晕厥及其治疗指导方面非常有用。最后,对于尽管经过广泛检查仍原因不明的反复晕厥患者,植入式循环记录仪可能会记录发作时的心律并提供或排除诊断。本文的讨论简要概述了晕厥的临床范围,并描述了一种逐步、系统的方法来诊断这个常见但具有挑战性的医学问题,重点是晕厥检查的最新进展。