Recule C, Croizé J, Coppéré C, Hirtz P, Goût J P, Le Noc P
Laboratoire de Bactériologie, CHRU de Grenoble, France.
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1993 Mar;41(3):249-54.
Serologic test for Pseudomonas aeruginosa have been found useful for differentiating colonization from infection, especially in chronic disease. A Western blot method was compared with the ELISA used routinely. The Western blot detected serum IgGs against P. aeruginosa outer membrane proteins, whereas the ELISA reacted with IgGs against soluble P. aeruginosa antigens. Among the 103 sera from 58 cystic fibrosis patients studied, all those with ELISA reactivity were positive by Western blot. The antibody response was detected earlier by Western blot than by ELISA, suggesting that the former technique may be useful for the early diagnosis of infection.
已发现铜绿假单胞菌的血清学检测有助于区分定植与感染,尤其是在慢性疾病中。将一种蛋白质印迹法与常规使用的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)进行了比较。蛋白质印迹法检测针对铜绿假单胞菌外膜蛋白的血清IgG,而ELISA则与针对可溶性铜绿假单胞菌抗原的IgG发生反应。在所研究的来自58名囊性纤维化患者的103份血清中,所有ELISA反应阳性的血清通过蛋白质印迹法检测也呈阳性。蛋白质印迹法比ELISA更早检测到抗体反应,这表明前一种技术可能有助于感染的早期诊断。