Mordkoff J T, Miller J
University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Percept Psychophys. 1993 May;53(5):527-35. doi: 10.3758/bf03205201.
When a visual display contains two targets, both of which require the same response, reaction times (RTs) are faster than when only one target appears. This effect has previously been obtained regardless of whether the redundant targets are the same or different in shape, and in at least one set of two-target experiments, the redundancy gains have been larger for different targets (Grice & Reed, 1992). Experiments with two different targets have also revealed violations of the race-model inequality, suggesting that redundant targets coactivate the response (Miller, 1982). The present paper reexamines both of these findings, because both appear to be inconsistent with the interactive race model (Mordkoff & Yantis, 1991). Experiment 1 shows that the race-model inequality is not violated when the experimental design is free of biased contingencies; Experiment 1 also provides evidence that target preferences may artifactually produce the RT advantage for different- over same-target trials. Experiment 2, however, shows that the race-model inequality is violated when the frequencies of single- and redundant-target displays are equated (without introducing any biased contingencies), implying that the interactive race model cannot account for the results of experiments involving more than one type of target. Alternative loci for coactivation are briefly discussed.
当视觉显示器包含两个目标且都需要相同反应时,反应时间(RTs)比仅出现一个目标时更快。此前,无论多余目标在形状上相同还是不同,都能获得这种效应,并且在至少一组双目标实验中,不同目标的多余增益更大(Grice & Reed,1992)。对两个不同目标进行的实验也揭示了对竞争模型不等式的违背,这表明多余目标会共同激活反应(Miller,1982)。本文重新审视了这两个发现,因为它们似乎都与交互式竞争模型(Mordkoff & Yantis,1991)不一致。实验1表明,当实验设计没有偏差性意外情况时,竞争模型不等式不会被违背;实验1还提供了证据,表明目标偏好可能会人为地在不同目标试验中产生反应时优势,而不是相同目标试验。然而,实验2表明,当单目标和多余目标显示器的频率相等时(不引入任何偏差性意外情况),竞争模型不等式会被违背,这意味着交互式竞争模型无法解释涉及不止一种类型目标的实验结果。文中简要讨论了共同激活的其他位点。