Donovan M G, Dickerson N C, Hellstein J W, Hanson L J
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX 79920-5001.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993 Aug;51(8):898-903. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(10)80112-0.
Calvarial bone has been reported to be superior to iliac bone for onlay bone grafting due to decreased resorption. This study evaluated the physical, histologic, and radiographic characteristics of calvarial and corticocancellous iliac onlay bone grafts in nine Pitman-Moore miniature swine at 2 weeks, and at 1-, 2-, 4-, 6-, 7-, 8-, 10-, and 12-month intervals. Compared with iliac grafts, the calvarial onlay grafts had more than a twofold greater radiographic density. Statistical analysis of the mature grafts using the standard of estimated means of the bone graft volumes revealed 85% retention of the calvarial grafts compared with 34% retention of the grafted iliac bone. There was no subjective difference in the rate or degree of revascularization between the two grafted materials.
据报道,由于颅骨骨吸收减少,在覆盖骨移植方面,颅骨优于髂骨。本研究评估了9只皮特曼-摩尔小型猪的颅骨和皮质松质髂骨覆盖骨移植在2周时以及1、2、4、6、7、8、10和12个月间隔时的物理、组织学和放射学特征。与髂骨移植相比,颅骨覆盖移植的放射密度高出两倍多。使用骨移植体积估计均值标准对成熟移植进行的统计分析显示,颅骨移植保留率为85%,而移植髂骨的保留率为34%。两种移植材料在血管化速率或程度上没有主观差异。