Temkin-Greener H, Meiners M R, Petty E, Szydlowski J
Community Coalition for Long Term Care, Rochester, NY 14604.
Med Care. 1993 Aug;31(8):663-79. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199308000-00001.
Medicaid spend-down continues to be of considerable interest in public policy discussions regarding long-term care financing reforms. Yet, "measuring" of spend-down has been difficult because of data limitations. This study focuses on patterns of spend-down affecting those who become Medicaid eligible both in nursing homes and in the community. The study uses a longitudinal, person-specific, merged Medicare and Medicaid claims and eligibility file constructed for Monroe County, New York. The analyses show that 27% of those who enter nursing homes as private pay can be expected to spend-down to Medicaid while in a nursing home. The spend-downers remain in nursing homes for a prolonged time, with 63% staying for more than 3 years. On admission, spend-downers appear somewhat more likely than those who remained private pay or Medicaid throughout to have been less disabled in terms of activities of daily living (ADL). The community-based spend-down group is larger, younger, and more heavily represented by those who are poor or marginally poor, than the nursing home-based spend-down population. Their spend-down to Medicaid appears to have been triggered principally by the cost of acute medical care not covered by Medicare or another third-party payer. It is this population of the elderly that would have been the principal beneficiary of the short-lived 1989 Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act. The results of this study indicate that neither the existing private long-term care insurance policies nor the currently circulating public coverage proposals alone are sufficient to protect older persons, at risk of spend-down to Medicaid, from impoverishment. Effective long-term care financing reform will need to create partnerships between public and private insurance, rather than look at them as competing options.
在有关长期护理融资改革的公共政策讨论中,医疗补助支出继续受到相当大的关注。然而,由于数据限制,对支出的“衡量”一直很困难。本研究关注影响养老院和社区中符合医疗补助资格人群的支出模式。该研究使用了为纽约门罗县构建的纵向、针对个人的医疗保险和医疗补助合并索赔及资格文件。分析表明,以自费形式进入养老院的人中,预计有27%在养老院期间会支出至符合医疗补助资格。支出者在养老院停留的时间较长,63%的人停留超过3年。入院时,支出者在日常生活活动(ADL)方面的残疾程度似乎比那些一直自费或一直享受医疗补助的人略低。与基于养老院的支出人群相比,基于社区的支出群体规模更大、更年轻,且贫困人口或边缘贫困人口的占比更高。他们支出至符合医疗补助资格的情况似乎主要是由医疗保险或其他第三方支付者未涵盖的急性医疗费用引发的。正是这一老年人群体本应是1989年短暂实施的《医疗保险灾难性保险法案》的主要受益者。本研究结果表明,现有的私人长期护理保险政策和目前流传的公共保险提案单独一项都不足以保护有支出至符合医疗补助资格风险的老年人免于贫困。有效的长期护理融资改革需要在公共保险和私人保险之间建立伙伴关系,而不是将它们视为相互竞争的选项。