Zuckerman S, Holahan J, Popkin J, Terrell S, Kochhar R
Urban Institute, Washington, DC 20037.
Med Care. 1993 Aug;31(8):694-710. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199308000-00003.
This study develops two sets of price indices for Medicare physician services. The first measures price changes, and the second measures geographic price differentials. The indices can be used to adjust Medicare physician spending data to examine growth or variations in the volume and intensity of services. In both instances, it is necessary to apply an index form that reflects both the rapid changes and variability in the mix of physician services received by Medicare beneficiaries and their relative importance. This suggests that an index based on a fixed basket of services (e.g., a Laspeyres index) can produce a biased measure of price. An alternative methodology based on the Fisher's Ideal Index form was used. This index allows service weights to vary over time and across areas. In the case of price change, the index is "chained" to acknowledge the introduction of new services over several years. It is concluded that the Fisher's Ideal approach is essential for cross-sectional price comparisons, in light of the high variability in service mix across areas. In measuring price changes, it was found that "chaining" was more important empirically than allowing the relative importance of services to change between years. During the 1985-1989 study period, Medicare payment rates grew, on average, by 3.5% annually. This rate varied across both time and types of services as a result of differential fee updates and explicit pricing policies implemented by Medicare (e.g., reductions in payments for "overvalued" procedures). Cross-sectionally, our results show that 1988 fees in the highest-priced areas were more than 1.5 times those in the lowest-priced areas.
本研究为医疗保险医师服务编制了两套价格指数。第一套衡量价格变化,第二套衡量地区价格差异。这些指数可用于调整医疗保险医师支出数据,以考察服务量和强度的增长或变化情况。在这两种情况下,都需要采用一种指数形式,以反映医疗保险受益人群体所接受的医师服务组合的快速变化和变异性及其相对重要性。这表明基于固定服务篮子的指数(如拉氏指数)可能会产生有偏差的价格衡量。我们采用了一种基于费雪理想指数形式的替代方法。该指数允许服务权重随时间和地区而变化。在价格变化的情况下,该指数采用“链式”计算,以认可多年来新服务的引入。研究得出结论,鉴于各地区服务组合的高度变异性,费雪理想方法对于横断面价格比较至关重要。在衡量价格变化时,从经验上看,“链式”计算比允许服务的相对重要性在不同年份之间变化更为重要。在1985 - 1989年的研究期间,医疗保险支付率平均每年增长3.5%。由于医疗保险实施的差异化费用更新和明确定价政策(如降低“高估”程序的支付),这一增长率在不同时间和服务类型之间有所不同。从横断面来看,我们的结果显示,1988年价格最高地区的费用是价格最低地区的1.5倍多。