Suppr超能文献

[门诊腹腔镜绝育术——局部镇痛和静脉镇静应取代全身麻醉吗?一项对比临床试验]

[Ambulatory laparoscopic sterilization--should local analgesia and intravenous sedation replace general anesthesia? A comparative clinical trial].

作者信息

Raeder J C, Børdahl P E, Nordentoft J, Kirste U, Refsdahl A

机构信息

Anestesiavdelingen, Baerum sykehus, Baerum Postterminal.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1993 May 20;113(13):1559-62.

PMID:8337639
Abstract

A prospective, randomized study comprised 125 outpatient laparoscopic sterilization patients who had received either general anaesthesia or local anaesthesia together with intravenous sedation. The patients who had received local anaesthesia suffered significantly less postoperative pain and sore throat. Recovery and discharge were similar in the two groups, but those given a general anaesthetic were more drowsy in the evening on the day of operation. The time spent in the operating theatre was significantly shorter for the group given local anaesthesia, and the costs were lower. The majority of patients from both groups would prefer local anaesthesia and sedation for a similar procedure in the future. We conclude that local anaesthesia by intravenous sedation is the method of choice for laparoscopic sterilization.

摘要

一项前瞻性随机研究纳入了125例接受门诊腹腔镜绝育术的患者,这些患者分别接受了全身麻醉或局部麻醉加静脉镇静。接受局部麻醉的患者术后疼痛和喉咙痛明显较轻。两组患者的恢复和出院情况相似,但接受全身麻醉的患者在手术当天晚上更嗜睡。局部麻醉组在手术室的时间明显更短,费用也更低。两组中的大多数患者未来进行类似手术时更倾向于选择局部麻醉和镇静。我们得出结论,静脉镇静下的局部麻醉是腹腔镜绝育术的首选方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验