• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[通过呼吸气体交换测量评估运动试验期间VVI和DDD心脏刺激的比较。运动试验期间收缩功能正常且完全房室传导阻滞不变的患者研究]

[Comparison of VVI and DDD cardiac stimulation during exercise test evaluated by respiratory gas exchange measurement. Study of patients with normal systolic function and complete atrioventricular block unchanged during exercise test].

作者信息

Chabernaud J M, Guéret P, Blanc P, Bavoux O, Bensaid J

机构信息

Service de cardiologie, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges.

出版信息

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1993 Jan;86(1):69-74.

PMID:8338403
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare respiratory gas exchanges during exercise during VVI and DDD modes of cardiac pacing, the latter offering the possibility of preserving the atrio-ventricular sequence and of increasing the heart rate during exercise. Ten patients with normal systolic function (6 men, 4 women; average age 51 years), complete atrioventricular block and no acceleration of the heart rate during exercise, undergoing implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker, performed maximal exercise stress testing after programming VVI or DDD modes successively with a one hour interval between the two investigations. The parameters recorded at peak exercise capacity were compared according to the pacing mode. Exercise duration (8 +/- 2 mn), maximal heart rate (133 +/- 10 bpm), systolic blood pressure (175 +/- 24 mmHg), work load (104 +/- 20 watts) were significantly higher in the DDD than in the VVI mode (6 +/- 2 mn, 73 +/- 8 bpm, 147 +/- 22 mmHg, 84 +/- 17 watts respectively, p < 0.001 for each parameter). Above all, peak oxygen uptake in the DDD mode was 23.2 +/- 6 ml/kg/mn compared to 19.2 +/- 5.1 ml/kg/mn in the VVI mode (p < 0.001). The increased heart rate obtained with DDD pacing seems to be the main factor which explains the differences observed. At lower exercise levels, there was no significant difference in ventilatory threshold between VVI and DDD pacing. The absence of underlying cardiac disease and a single, fixed atrioventricular delay may reduce the value of maintaining the atrioventricular sequence at more moderate exercise levels. This study shows that dual-chamber pacing increases maximal exercise capacity. These observations may be useful when considering the choice of a cardiac pacemaker.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较心脏起搏的VVI模式和DDD模式在运动期间的呼吸气体交换情况,后者能够在运动期间保持房室顺序并提高心率。10例收缩功能正常的患者(6例男性,4例女性;平均年龄51岁),患有完全性房室传导阻滞且运动期间心率无加快,在植入双腔起搏器后,先后以VVI模式和DDD模式进行编程,两次检查之间间隔1小时,然后进行最大运动负荷测试。根据起搏模式比较在运动能力峰值时记录的参数。DDD模式下的运动持续时间(8±2分钟)、最大心率(133±10次/分钟)、收缩压(175±24 mmHg)、工作负荷(104±20瓦)均显著高于VVI模式(分别为6±2分钟、73±8次/分钟、147±22 mmHg、84±17瓦,每个参数p<0.001)。最重要的是,DDD模式下的峰值摄氧量为23.2±6 ml/kg/分钟,而VVI模式下为19.2±5.1 ml/kg/分钟(p<0.001)。DDD起搏获得的心率增加似乎是解释所观察到差异的主要因素。在较低运动水平时,VVI起搏和DDD起搏之间的通气阈值无显著差异。没有潜在的心脏病以及单一、固定的房室延迟可能会降低在中等运动水平维持房室顺序的价值。本研究表明双腔起搏可提高最大运动能力。在考虑选择心脏起搏器时,这些观察结果可能会有所帮助。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of VVI and DDD cardiac stimulation during exercise test evaluated by respiratory gas exchange measurement. Study of patients with normal systolic function and complete atrioventricular block unchanged during exercise test].[通过呼吸气体交换测量评估运动试验期间VVI和DDD心脏刺激的比较。运动试验期间收缩功能正常且完全房室传导阻滞不变的患者研究]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1993 Jan;86(1):69-74.
2
[Effect of AV synchronization and rate increase on hemodynamics and on atrial natriuretic peptide in patients with total AV block].[房室同步及心率增加对完全性房室传导阻滞患者血流动力学及心房利钠肽的影响]
Z Kardiol. 1990 Aug;79(8):547-56.
3
[Atrial rate and increased work capacity during DDD pacing in patients with a high level atrioventricular block].[高度房室传导阻滞患者DDD起搏时的心房率及工作能力增加]
Cor Vasa. 1993;35(4):152-6.
4
[The effect of changes in stroke volume on QT dispersion during long-term DDD and VVI pacing].[长期DDD和VVI起搏期间每搏输出量变化对QT离散度的影响]
Przegl Lek. 2001;58(3):111-6.
5
[DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].[DDD与DDDR起搏器刺激:心肺功能、房性心律失常发生率及生活质量的比较]
Z Kardiol. 1996 Apr;85(4):226-36.
6
Haemodynamic advantage with single chamber rate responsive pacemakers over dual chamber pacemakers during exercise in chronotropic incompetence.在变时功能不全患者运动期间,单腔频率应答起搏器相较于双腔起搏器的血流动力学优势。
Indian Heart J. 1992 Jul-Aug;44(4):231-4.
7
DDD vs. VVI pacing in patients aged over 75 years with complete heart block: a double-blind crossover comparison.75岁以上完全性心脏传导阻滞患者的DDD起搏与VVI起搏:双盲交叉比较
Q J Med. 1994 Apr;87(4):245-51.
8
[Relative contribution of standard and physiologic stimulation for maximal work capacity in patients with complete atrioventricular block].[标准刺激与生理刺激对完全性房室传导阻滞患者最大工作能力的相对贡献]
Vnitr Lek. 1992 Feb;38(2):105-11.
9
Effects of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on ventilatory response to exercise in patients with complete AV block.变时性反应性心脏起搏对完全性房室传导阻滞患者运动通气反应的影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Oct;15(10 Pt 1):1482-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb02922.x.
10
The effects of rate-adaptive atrial pacing versus ventricular backup pacing on exercise capacity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.频率适应性心房起搏与心室备用起搏对左心室功能不全患者运动能力的影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Jan;32(1):1-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02169.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Cardiac Pacemaker Programming Modes on Exercise Capacity.心脏起搏器程控模式对运动能力的影响。
In Vivo. 2018 Mar-Apr;32(2):419-424. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11256.
2
Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.用于病态窦房结综合征和房室传导阻滞的双腔与单腔心室起搏器
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(2):CD003710. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003710.pub2.