Suppr超能文献

[通过呼吸气体交换测量评估运动试验期间VVI和DDD心脏刺激的比较。运动试验期间收缩功能正常且完全房室传导阻滞不变的患者研究]

[Comparison of VVI and DDD cardiac stimulation during exercise test evaluated by respiratory gas exchange measurement. Study of patients with normal systolic function and complete atrioventricular block unchanged during exercise test].

作者信息

Chabernaud J M, Guéret P, Blanc P, Bavoux O, Bensaid J

机构信息

Service de cardiologie, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges.

出版信息

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1993 Jan;86(1):69-74.

PMID:8338403
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare respiratory gas exchanges during exercise during VVI and DDD modes of cardiac pacing, the latter offering the possibility of preserving the atrio-ventricular sequence and of increasing the heart rate during exercise. Ten patients with normal systolic function (6 men, 4 women; average age 51 years), complete atrioventricular block and no acceleration of the heart rate during exercise, undergoing implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker, performed maximal exercise stress testing after programming VVI or DDD modes successively with a one hour interval between the two investigations. The parameters recorded at peak exercise capacity were compared according to the pacing mode. Exercise duration (8 +/- 2 mn), maximal heart rate (133 +/- 10 bpm), systolic blood pressure (175 +/- 24 mmHg), work load (104 +/- 20 watts) were significantly higher in the DDD than in the VVI mode (6 +/- 2 mn, 73 +/- 8 bpm, 147 +/- 22 mmHg, 84 +/- 17 watts respectively, p < 0.001 for each parameter). Above all, peak oxygen uptake in the DDD mode was 23.2 +/- 6 ml/kg/mn compared to 19.2 +/- 5.1 ml/kg/mn in the VVI mode (p < 0.001). The increased heart rate obtained with DDD pacing seems to be the main factor which explains the differences observed. At lower exercise levels, there was no significant difference in ventilatory threshold between VVI and DDD pacing. The absence of underlying cardiac disease and a single, fixed atrioventricular delay may reduce the value of maintaining the atrioventricular sequence at more moderate exercise levels. This study shows that dual-chamber pacing increases maximal exercise capacity. These observations may be useful when considering the choice of a cardiac pacemaker.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较心脏起搏的VVI模式和DDD模式在运动期间的呼吸气体交换情况,后者能够在运动期间保持房室顺序并提高心率。10例收缩功能正常的患者(6例男性,4例女性;平均年龄51岁),患有完全性房室传导阻滞且运动期间心率无加快,在植入双腔起搏器后,先后以VVI模式和DDD模式进行编程,两次检查之间间隔1小时,然后进行最大运动负荷测试。根据起搏模式比较在运动能力峰值时记录的参数。DDD模式下的运动持续时间(8±2分钟)、最大心率(133±10次/分钟)、收缩压(175±24 mmHg)、工作负荷(104±20瓦)均显著高于VVI模式(分别为6±2分钟、73±8次/分钟、147±22 mmHg、84±17瓦,每个参数p<0.001)。最重要的是,DDD模式下的峰值摄氧量为23.2±6 ml/kg/分钟,而VVI模式下为19.2±5.1 ml/kg/分钟(p<0.001)。DDD起搏获得的心率增加似乎是解释所观察到差异的主要因素。在较低运动水平时,VVI起搏和DDD起搏之间的通气阈值无显著差异。没有潜在的心脏病以及单一、固定的房室延迟可能会降低在中等运动水平维持房室顺序的价值。本研究表明双腔起搏可提高最大运动能力。在考虑选择心脏起搏器时,这些观察结果可能会有所帮助。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验