Suppr超能文献

用于心脏手术后支持衰竭心脏的离心式心室辅助装置。

Centrifugal ventricular assist device for support of the failing heart after cardiac surgery.

作者信息

Lee W A, Gillinov A M, Cameron D E, Thompson S, Birenbaum I, Baumgartner W A, Stuart R S, Watkins L, Gardner T J, Gott V L

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21205.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1993 Aug;21(8):1186-91. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199308000-00019.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the morbidity and mortality associated with use of centrifugal ventricular assist devices for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock and to determine factors that might influence outcome and thus, aid in patient selection.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

Surgical intensive care unit in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

During a 6-yr period, a total of 7,385 adult patients underwent cardiac operations requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Myocardial protection consisted of single-dose cold crystalloid cardioplegia and continuous topical hypothermia by saline lavage. A total of 72 (1%) patients developed postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. Of 72 patients, 28 met the institutional criteria and were placed on centrifugal ventricular assist devices.

INTERVENTIONS

Twenty-eight adult patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock were supported with centrifugal ventricular assist devices.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 15 patients received left ventricular assist devices, five received right ventricular assist devices, and eight received both right and left ventricular assist devices. Mean age of ventricular assistance patients was 50.8 +/- 12.9 yrs (range 22 to 72), and mean duration of ventricular assistance was 2.8 +/- 2.5 days (range 4 hrs to 10 days; median 2 days). Twenty-five complications occurred in 16 patients and included bleeding (13), tamponade (2), systemic embolism (6), seizures (2), and sepsis (2). Nine patients required reexploration for bleeding or tamponade. Nine (32%) of 28 patients were discharged from the hospital. Ventricular assistance for cardiac failure after transplantation was associated with improved survival (p < .10), while age > 50 yrs and postoperative tamponade each showed trends toward association with mortality (p = .10). Survival was not predicted by gender, weight, time on cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamp time, urgency of operation, or preoperative congestive heart failure. At 27 +/- 20 months follow-up, all survivors were alive and New York Heart Association functional class I or II.

CONCLUSIONS

These results document a low incidence of ventricular assist device use in a surgical practice that employs a relatively simple method of myocardial protection. When postcardiotomy ventricular assistance was necessary, a centrifugal pump was used and successful outcome and satisfactory long-term results were possible in nearly one third of patients. Ventricular assistance for cardiac failure after transplantation was associated with improved survival. Older age is a relative contraindication to mechanical ventricular assistance.

摘要

目的

确定使用离心式心室辅助装置治疗心脏术后心源性休克的发病率和死亡率,并确定可能影响预后的因素,从而辅助患者选择。

设计

一项回顾性研究。

地点

一所大学医院的外科重症监护病房。

患者

在6年期间,共有7385例成年患者接受了需要体外循环的心脏手术。心肌保护措施包括单剂量冷晶体心脏停搏液和经盐水灌洗持续局部低温。共有72例(1%)患者发生心脏术后心源性休克。在这72例患者中,28例符合机构标准并使用了离心式心室辅助装置。

干预措施

28例心脏术后心源性休克的成年患者接受了离心式心室辅助装置支持。

测量指标和主要结果

共有15例患者接受左心室辅助装置,5例接受右心室辅助装置,8例同时接受右心室和左心室辅助装置。接受心室辅助的患者平均年龄为50.8±12.9岁(范围22至72岁),平均心室辅助时间为2.8±2.5天(范围4小时至10天;中位数2天)。16例患者发生25种并发症,包括出血(13例)、心包填塞(2例)、全身性栓塞(6例)、癫痫发作(2例)和脓毒症(2例)。9例患者因出血或心包填塞需要再次手术探查。28例患者中有9例(32%)出院。移植后因心力衰竭接受心室辅助与生存率提高相关(p<0.10),而年龄>50岁和术后心包填塞各自显示出与死亡率相关的趋势(p=0.10)。生存率无法通过性别、体重、体外循环时间、主动脉阻断时间、手术紧迫性或术前充血性心力衰竭来预测。在27±20个月的随访中,所有幸存者均存活,纽约心脏协会心功能分级为I级或II级。

结论

这些结果表明,在采用相对简单心肌保护方法的外科实践中,心室辅助装置的使用发生率较低。当心脏术后需要心室辅助时,使用了离心泵,近三分之一的患者可能获得成功结局和满意的长期结果。移植后因心力衰竭接受心室辅助与生存率提高相关。年龄较大是机械心室辅助的相对禁忌证。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验