Lee H K, Chung M S, Kim H J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Korea.
Int Orthop. 1993;17(3):193-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00186385.
We have compared the passage of regenerating axons through old degenerated nerve autografts and fresh nerve autografts in two groups of Sprague Dawley rats. In one group the right sciatic nerve was divided and repaired with the graft taken from the distal segment of the left sciatic nerve, which had been severed 15 weeks before. In the other group the right sciatic nerve was repaired with the graft taken from the intact left sciatic nerve. Eight weeks later the myelinated axons were counted at three different locations in the grafted right sciatic nerve in both groups. The old degenerated nerve autografts were less effective in allowing the passage of regenerating axons than the fresh nerve autografts, but the difference was not great. This provides justification for the use of old degenerated nerve as an additional graft where a large number of autogenous nerve grafts are required, such as in the operative treatment of injuries to the brachial plexus.
我们比较了两组斯普拉格-道利大鼠中再生轴突通过陈旧性退变神经自体移植物和新鲜神经自体移植物的情况。在一组中,切断右侧坐骨神经,并用取自15周前已切断的左侧坐骨神经远段的移植物进行修复。在另一组中,用取自完整左侧坐骨神经的移植物修复右侧坐骨神经。8周后,对两组移植的右侧坐骨神经中三个不同位置的有髓轴突进行计数。陈旧性退变神经自体移植物在允许再生轴突通过方面比新鲜神经自体移植物效果差,但差异不大。这为在需要大量自体神经移植物的情况下,如臂丛神经损伤的手术治疗中,使用陈旧性退变神经作为额外的移植物提供了依据。