• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Prehospital cardiac arrest survival and neurologic recovery.

作者信息

Hillis M, Sinclair D, Butler G, Cain E

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Victoria General Hospital, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 1993 May-Jun;11(3):245-52. doi: 10.1016/0736-4679(93)90041-5.

DOI:10.1016/0736-4679(93)90041-5
PMID:8340577
Abstract

Many studies of prehospital defibrillation have been conducted but the effects of airway intervention are unknown and neurologic follow-up has been incomplete. A non-randomized cohort prospective study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of defibrillation in prehospital cardiac arrest. Two ambulance companies in the study area developed a defibrillation protocol and they formed the experimental group. A subgroup of these patients received airway management with an esophageal obturator airway (EOA) or endotracheal intubation (ETT). The control group was composed of patients who suffered a prehospital cardiac arrest and did not receive prehospital defibrillation. All survivors were assessed for residual deficits using the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS). A total of 221 patients were studied over a 32-month period. Both the experimental group (N = 161) and the control group (N = 60) were comparable with respect to age, sex distribution, and ambulance response time. Survival to hospital discharge was 2/60 (3.3%) in the control group and 12/161 (6.3%) in the experimental group. This difference is not statistically significant. Survival in the experimental group by airway management technique was basic airway support (3/76 3.9%), EOA (3/67 4.5%), and ETT (6/48 12.5%). The improved effect on survival by ETT management was statistically significant. Survivors had minor differences in memory, work, and recreation as compared to ischemic heart disease patients as measured by the SIP and DRS. No effect of defibrillation was found on survival to hospital discharge. However, endotracheal intubation improved survival in defibrillated patients. Survivors had a good functional outcome.

摘要

相似文献

1
Prehospital cardiac arrest survival and neurologic recovery.
J Emerg Med. 1993 May-Jun;11(3):245-52. doi: 10.1016/0736-4679(93)90041-5.
2
Prehospital defibrillation performed by emergency medical technicians in rural communities.农村社区急救医疗技术人员进行的院前除颤。
N Engl J Med. 1984 Jan 26;310(4):219-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198401263100403.
3
Improved out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival through the inexpensive optimization of an existing defibrillation program: OPALS study phase II. Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support.通过对现有除颤计划进行低成本优化提高院外心脏骤停存活率:OPALS研究第二阶段。安大略省院前高级生命支持。
JAMA. 1999 Apr 7;281(13):1175-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.13.1175.
4
An evaluation of automated defibrillation and manual defibrillation by emergency medical technicians in a rural setting.
Am J Emerg Med. 1993 Mar;11(2):125-30. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(93)90104-j.
5
Prehospital endotracheal tube airway or esophageal gastric tube airway: a critical comparison.院前气管内插管气道或食管胃管气道:一项关键比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 1985 Feb;14(2):102-12. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(85)81069-6.
6
Relationship of timeliness of paramedic advanced life support interventions to outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by first responders with defibrillators.护理人员高级生命支持干预的及时性与使用除颤器的急救人员治疗的院外心脏骤停结局的关系。
Ann Emerg Med. 1996 May;27(5):638-48. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70169-5.
7
Optimal defibrillation response intervals for maximum out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates.实现最高院外心脏骤停存活率的最佳除颤反应间隔时间。
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Aug;42(2):242-50. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.266.
8
Influence of emergency medical services systems and prehospital defibrillation on survival of sudden cardiac death victims.紧急医疗服务系统和院前除颤对心脏性猝死患者生存率的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 1989 Jan;7(1):68-82. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(89)90089-2.
9
Effects of early defibrillation by ambulance personnel on short- and long-term outcome of cardiac arrest survival: the Munich experiment.急救人员早期除颤对心脏骤停存活者短期和长期预后的影响:慕尼黑实验
Chest. 1997 Dec;112(6):1584-91. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.6.1584.
10
Modifiable factors associated with improved cardiac arrest survival in a multicenter basic life support/defibrillation system: OPALS Study Phase I results. Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support.在多中心基础生命支持/除颤系统中与提高心脏骤停存活率相关的可改变因素:安大略省院外高级生命支持(OPALS)研究第一阶段结果
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Jan;33(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70415-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Recovery, long-term cognitive outcome and quality of life following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停后的恢复情况、长期认知结果及生活质量
J Rehabil Med. 2014 Jul;46(7):691-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1816.
2
Part 12: Education, implementation, and teams: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.第12部分:教育、实施与团队:2010年心肺复苏及心血管急救科学与治疗建议国际共识。
Resuscitation. 2010 Oct;81 Suppl 1(1):e288-330. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.030.
3
Emergency intubation for acutely ill and injured patients.
急危重症患者的紧急气管插管术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;2008(2):CD001429. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001429.pub2.
4
Paramedics, technicians, and survival from out of hospital cardiac arrest.护理人员、技术人员与院外心脏骤停后的生存情况
J Accid Emerg Med. 1997 Sep;14(5):278-82. doi: 10.1136/emj.14.5.278.
5
Chronic memory impairment after cardiac arrest outside hospital.院外心脏骤停后的慢性记忆障碍
BMJ. 1996 Jul 20;313(7050):143-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7050.143.
6
Quality of life bibliography and indexes: 1993 update.生活质量参考书目与索引:1993年更新版
Qual Life Res. 1995 Feb;4(1):53-74. doi: 10.1007/BF00434384.