Suppr超能文献

心室心内膜电图与起搏器感知

The ventricular endocardial electrogram and pacemaker sensing.

作者信息

Furman S, Hurzeler P, DeCaprio V

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977 Feb;73(2):258-66.

PMID:834065
Abstract

During cardiac pacemaker implantation and pulse generator replacement, unipolar, right ventricular electrograms were recorded from 133 patients (77 at implantation and 56 at pulse generator replacement) at 200 mm. per second with a band pass of 0.1 to 2,000 Hz on photographic paper. Each signal was analyzed for electrogram structure, peak-to-peak voltage deflection, ST-segment displacement, and maximum voltage deflection/time (slew rate [dv/dt]). The QRS designation of the peripheral electrocardiogram was used for the endocardial electrogram wave forms, which are sufficiently similar to allow QRS terminology to be used. Of the acute electrograms (at implantation) 58 per cent had a small Q followed by an R wave which was 10 per cent or more of the S amplitude; 30 per cent had an R wave less than 10 per cent of the S; all had a straight line segment, within the QRS complex, exhibiting maximum amplitude and slew rate and a large ST-segment elevation. In 12 per cent the Q was followed by an R wave only. The mean voltage was 12.4 mv. +/- 5.5, the slew rate mean 2.9 v. per second +/- 1.5, and the ST displacement 4.0 mv. +/- 2.6. All chronic (over 6 months after implantation) electrograms but one had no ST-segment elevation, and all had an inverted T wave and a straight line segment extending from the highest to the lowest peaks of the QRS complex. The chronic voltage amplitude is 15 per cent lower and the slew rate 41 per cent lower than that of the acute electrogram. The margin of amplitude and slew rate required at implantation to maintain adequate postimplant sensing must accommodate these changes. The possibility of satisfactory pacing threshold associated with poor sensing exists. Knowledge of the amplitude and slew rate allows the determination of the optimal position for electrode placement and the sensitivity required for satisfactory pulse generator selection, design, and operation.

摘要

在心脏起搏器植入和脉冲发生器更换过程中,对133例患者(77例植入时、56例脉冲发生器更换时)记录了单极右心室电图,记录速度为每秒200毫米,记录在相纸上,带通为0.1至2000赫兹。对每个信号分析电图结构、峰峰值电压偏转、ST段移位以及最大电压偏转/时间( slew速率[dv/dt])。外周心电图的QRS命名用于心内膜电图波形,二者足够相似,可使用QRS术语。在急性电图(植入时)中,58%有一个小Q波,随后是一个R波,其幅度为S波幅度的10%或更多;30%的R波小于S波的10%;所有电图在QRS复合波内都有一段直线段,呈现最大幅度和slew速率以及较大的ST段抬高。12%的情况是Q波后仅跟随一个R波。平均电压为12.4毫伏±5.5,slew速率平均为每秒2.9伏±1.5,ST段移位为4.0毫伏±2.6。除一例之外,所有慢性(植入后6个月以上)电图均无ST段抬高,且所有电图均有T波倒置以及从QRS复合波最高峰值延伸至最低峰值的直线段。慢性电压幅度比急性电图低15%,slew速率低41%。植入时维持充分的植入后感知所需的幅度和slew速率余量必须考虑到这些变化。存在起搏阈值满意但感知不佳的可能性。了解幅度和slew速率有助于确定电极放置的最佳位置以及选择、设计和操作满意的脉冲发生器所需的灵敏度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验