Suppr超能文献

约翰霍普金斯动物实验替代方法中心验证与技术转让委员会报告。体外毒性试验的验证与实施框架。

Report of the Validation and Technology Transfer Committee of the Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing. Framework for validation and implementation of in vitro toxicity tests.

作者信息

Goldberg A M, Frazier J M, Brusick D, Dickens M S, Flint O, Gettings S D, Hill R N, Lipnick R L, Renskers K J, Bradlaw J A

机构信息

Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Baltimore, MD 21205.

出版信息

Xenobiotica. 1993 May;23(5):563-72. doi: 10.3109/00498259309059395.

Abstract

The development and application of in vitro alternatives designed to reduce or replace the use of animals, or to lessen the distress and discomfort of laboratory animals, is a rapidly developing trend in toxicology. However, at present there is no formal administrative process to organize, coordinate, or evaluate validation activities. A framework capable of fostering the validation of new methods is essential for the effective transfer of new technological developments from the research laboratory into practical use. This committee has identified four essential validation resources: chemical bank(s), cell and tissue banks, a data bank, and reference laboratories. The creation of a Scientific Advisory Board composed of experts in the various aspects and endpoints of toxicity testing, and representing the academic, industrial and regulatory communities, is recommended. Test validation acceptance is contingent upon broad buy-in by disparate groups in the scientific community-academics, industry and government. This is best achieved by early and frequent communication among parties and agreement upon common goals. It is hoped that the creation of a validation infrastructure composed of the elements described in this report will facilitate scientific acceptance and utilization of alternative methodologies and speed implementation of replacement, reduction and refinement alternatives in toxicity testing.

摘要

旨在减少或取代动物使用,或减轻实验动物痛苦与不适的体外替代方法的开发与应用,是毒理学领域迅速发展的趋势。然而,目前尚无正式的管理流程来组织、协调或评估验证活动。一个能够促进新方法验证的框架对于新技术从研究实验室有效转化为实际应用至关重要。该委员会确定了四项基本验证资源:化学物质库、细胞和组织库、数据库以及参考实验室。建议成立一个由毒性测试各个方面和终点的专家组成的科学咨询委员会,代表学术界、产业界和监管机构。测试验证的接受取决于科学界不同群体(学术界、产业界和政府)的广泛认可。这最好通过各方尽早且频繁的沟通以及就共同目标达成一致来实现。希望由本报告所述要素组成的验证基础设施的建立将促进科学界对替代方法的接受和使用,并加快毒性测试中替代、减少和优化替代方法的实施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验