Berge T I
Institute of Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Odontology, University of Bergen, Norway.
Acta Odontol Scand. 1993 Jun;51(3):171-81. doi: 10.3109/00016359309041163.
A questionnaire on third-molar problems was mailed to a systematic random sample of 200 Norwegian general dental practitioners in November 1991. The return rate was 88%. Similar questions were given to 59 5th-year dental students, with a return rate of 83%. Ten third-molar cases were presented by means of copies of radiographs and written information. The following conclusions were drawn: Apart from a terminology problem consisting of lack of discrimination between the terms retention and impaction, overall good diagnostic abilities were shown by both practitioners and students. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of treatment decisions indicated that students were more radical than practitioners. The students had an increased referral rate for third-molar surgery, whereas the practitioners indicated a more selective practice of referring advanced cases.
1991年11月，一份关于第三磨牙问题的调查问卷被邮寄给200名挪威普通牙科医生的系统随机样本。回收率为88%。向59名五年级牙科学生提出了类似问题，回收率为83%。通过X光片副本和书面信息展示了10个第三磨牙病例。得出以下结论：除了存在保留和阻生这两个术语缺乏区分的术语问题外，从业者和学生都表现出了总体良好的诊断能力。对治疗决策的受试者工作特征分析表明，学生比从业者更激进。学生进行第三磨牙手术的转诊率更高，而从业者则表示在转诊晚期病例时做法更具选择性。
